Electric potential, current question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a small dust mote with a mass of 3.2x10^-12 kg placed between two charged plates connected to a 20V power supply, creating an electric field of 400 V/m. The mote, starting from rest, moves towards the positive plate, indicating it carries a negative charge since negative charges are attracted to positive ones. To determine the charge on the mote, the relationship between electric force, mass, and acceleration is utilized, leading to a formula that incorporates displacement and time. The electric field direction is established as opposite to the force acting on the mote, confirming its negative charge. Overall, the analysis clarifies the mote's charge, its movement direction, and the electric field's orientation.
dura
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
QUESTION: a small dust mote of mass 3.2x10^-12kg is between two metal plates (one + one -)which can be conected to a 20V power supply. When the power supply is turned on, an electric field of 400 V/m is established. It is observed that the mote starts from rest when the field is turned on (t=0) and travels 1.0 mm in 10s.

a) what is the charge on the mote?
b) the mote moves toward the positive plate, what is the sign of the charge?
c) what is the direction of the electric field between the plates?

Alright... I have a really hard time with these questions, and frankly don't know where to start or how to tackle this. Can someone please help me out with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry, my math text writing sucks. The mass should read 3.2x10 (superscript) -12
 
(b) is easiest so start there. If the mote moves towards the positive plate, it means it is attracted to positive charges. What kind of charge is attracted to another positive charge? Negative of course.

(a) Because the electric field is constant, so is the electric force that pulls the mote. If the force on the mote is constant, so is its acceleration.
a = \frac{F_{ele}}{m} = \frac{Eq_m}{m}.
The mote's initial velocity is 0, so its displacement is given by:
x = \frac{1}{2}at^2
Rescuing the acceleration from there you get to:
a = \frac{Eq_m}{m} = \frac{2x}{t^2}
And that's easy to solve. :smile:

(c) Since \vec F_{ele} = \vec Eq, and as we saw the mote's charge is negative, the electric field is in the opposite direction of the electric force. And you already know the direction of the force since you know the mote is attracted to the positive plate. (The direction of the field can be explained in a number of other ways as well, but in our case this explanation is the most straightforward.)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top