Electric potential due to two point charges near origin

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric potential V at a point (x,y,z) near the origin due to two fixed point charges +q located at (±a,0,0). The potential is expressed as V = [q/4∏*ε*a] [[2+(2x²-y²-z²)/a²], with x, y, and z being small compared to a. The user initially attempted to use the superposition principle and binomial expansion to derive the potential from each charge but encountered difficulties in achieving the desired result. After further reflection, the user realized the need to retain terms up to the second order in their calculations. This highlights the importance of careful approximation in problems involving electric potential from multiple point charges.
raving_lunatic
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charge + q is fixed at each of the two points (±a,0,0). Show that the potential V at a point (x,y,z) near to the origin may be expressed as

V = [q/4∏*ε*a] [[2+(2x2-y2-z2)/a2]
where x, y and z are small compared with a.


Homework Equations



V(x) = q/4∏i*ε*r , where r is the distance between the point charge and x and V is the potential at x.

Superposition, i.e. V due to multiple point charges = the sum of V due to each point charge

(1+x)^n = 1+nx+... valid for small x.

The Attempt at a Solution



This seemed like an incredibly straightforward problem, which is probably why it's quite frustrating. I tried adding together the potentials due to each point charge, approximated using the binomial expansion:

V(q1) = q/4∏ε[(x+a)2 + y2 +z2]^-1/2

V(q2) = q/4∏εa[(a-x)2 + y2 +z2]^-1/2

Taking a out of the brackets as a common factor gives:

V(q1) = q/4∏εa [(x/a + 1)2+ (y2+z2)/a2)]^-1/2

and a similar expression for V(q2) but with (1-x/a)2.

I then expanded the squares and used (2x/a + (x2+y2+z2)/a2) as a small parameter to perform the binomial expansion; this gave

V(q1) = q/4∏εa [1 - x/a - (x2+y2+z2/2a2)]

V(q2) = q/4∏εa [1 + x/a - (x2+y2+z2/2a2)]

Which doesn't lead to the desired result when added; where did I go wrong?
 

Attachments

  • potential.png
    potential.png
    4.8 KB · Views: 572
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I've worked it out; need to keep the terms to the second order. Sorry.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top