Electric Potential Energy Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of two electrons that start at rest and accelerate away from each other due to electric potential energy. The key equation used is the conservation of energy, where the change in kinetic energy equals the negative change in electric energy. Participants clarify that the kinetic energy must account for both electrons, emphasizing that the system's center of mass remains stationary. Corrections are made regarding the treatment of kinetic energy differences and the proper use of potential energy formulas for two-point charges. Ultimately, the correct approach involves considering the system as a whole rather than treating the electrons individually.
MystiqThunder
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
Two electrons start at rest with a separation of 5.0*10-12m. Once released, the electrons accelerate away from each other. Calculate the speed of each electron when they are a very large distance apart.

Homework Equations


ΔEK+ΔEE=0

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so I know that:[/B]
  • The Electric force is in the same direction as the displacement, which means kinetic energy is increasing and electric energy is decreasing (ΔEK=-ΔEE)
  • As they move to a really far distance, the change in electric energy is equal to 0 - EE1 as anything divided by infinity is equal to zero
GIVENS:
mass of electron = 9.109*10-31 Kg
q = -1.60*10-19 C
k = 8.99*109
v1 = 0 m/s
r1 = 5.0*10-12 m

My process:
ΔEK+ΔEE=0
-ΔEE=ΔEK
-[kq1q2(1/r2-1/r1)]=½m(v2-v1)2
√[{-2(kq1q2(1/r2-1/r1)}/m]=v2
√[{-2(8.99*109)(-1.60*10-19)2(0-1/5.0*10-12)/(9.109*10-31)]=v2
1.0*107=v2

Is this correct?

Hopefully that shows it well, if not here is a picture (I write small, probably can't make out much):

EDIT: Looks like pic is a no show

IMG_20141119_213002.jpg



 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me as if you are moving only one charge to infinity. But the electrons are supposed to move away from each other.
 
BvU said:
Looks to me as if you are moving only one charge to infinity. But the electrons are supposed to move away from each other.
You are absolutely correct, as I discovered today walking into class. The conservation of energy comes from the kinetic energy of not just one but both electrons MOVING AWAY from each other, as you just said. Thanks a lot anyways :)
 
MystiqThunder said:
1. Homework Statement
Two electrons start at rest with a separation of 5.0*10-12m. Once released, the electrons accelerate away from each other. Calculate the speed of each electron when they are a very large distance apart.

Homework Equations


ΔEK+ΔEE=0

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so I know that:[/B]
  • The Electric force is in the same direction as the displacement, which means kinetic energy is increasing and electric energy is decreasing (ΔEK=-ΔEE)
  • As they move to a really far distance, the change in electric energy is equal to 0 - EE1 as anything divided by infinity is equal to zero

My process:
ΔEK+ΔEE=0
-ΔEE=ΔEK
-[kq1q2(1/r2-1/r1)]=½m(v2-v1)2

The last equation is wrong. The potential energy of a system of two point charges is kq1q2/d, where d is the separation between them.
The electrons interact and there is no external force. So the centre of mass of the system stays in rest The kinetic energy of the system is the sum of the kinetic energies of both electrons, not the difference between them! Initially, d=5.0*10-12m
 
ehild said:
The last equation is wrong. The potential energy of a system of two point charges is kq1q2/d, where d is the separation between them.
The electrons interact and there is no external force. So the centre of mass of the system stays in rest The kinetic energy of the system is the sum of the kinetic energies of both electrons, not the difference between them! Initially, d=5.0*10-12m

If you look at how he is using it, this is not the problem, r1 and r2 correspond to the distance between the electrons at two different times. The problem, as BvU noted, is in the setup and treatment of the kinetic energy.

Mystiq: The expression for the kinetic energy difference is wrong not only because you forgot about one of the electrons. The difference should be proporional to v1^2 - v2^2, not (v1-v2)^2. In this case, one of the velocities was zero so it did not make a difference, but it is something you will generally need to consider.
 
Sorry. I see now that r1 and r2 were distances at two different times.
The two-electron system can be replaced by a single particle with reduced mass, μ=m/2 if the particles are identical. The velocity of that "imaginary" particle is equal to the relative velocity u=va-vb of the real particles, while the CoM of the system is stationary. As they are identical va=-vb=v and u=2v. The kinetic energy is then KE=1/2 μ u^2, and the change of the kinetic energy is ΔKE=1/2 μ(u22-u12).
As the particles were in rest initially, u1=0, so the change of the KE is ΔKE=1/2 μu22.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top