1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Electric potential, field and charge density problem check

  1. Nov 3, 2006 #1
    V – Electric potential

    I drew the picture of basically a rod with end points a and –a on the x axis with a point b that sits as well on the x positive axis.

    Assuming that is correct, I then am asked to find the electric field using my previous answer on the same point. I did not partially derrive with respect to y or z for the j and k vector components because the original potential equation has no y or z variables which means 0.

    Please let me know if the problems are worked out correctly.

    My next question is:

    Finding the volume charge density in spherical coordinates bounded by:


    The formula was given by my teacher as he told us to use that in spherical charge denisty problems. He proved it through a tedious triple integral which I was not able to completly copy down.
    The problem I am having is I thought I was correctly setting up the problem but when he was doing a similar problem today on magnetism i noticed his bounds resulted in having each integral with 2-3 parts. Like a to r plus r to 2a and etc. I do not understand.

    Please help me, if you guys need more details let me know.
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 4, 2006 #2
    none of the links work for me.
  4. Nov 4, 2006 #3


  5. Nov 4, 2006 #4
    all that work is mine so please help, I typed it up on microsoft equation editor 3.0 then pasted into paintbrush and uploaded it as an image.
  6. Nov 5, 2006 #5
    it's been a year since i've had e&m, but the first part looks ok. i'm kind of confused on the second part, because you're saying a is a variable. i thought a was a constant? i guess it doesn't really matter, because the general formula on the axis would be a---->x

    the second one requires different integrals because the charge distribution is different for different regions. so, you'd need an integral for each of those regions to accurately calclulate stuff. i.e. 0->a, a->2a -- each region has a different density. make sense?

    i had a rough time in e&m (even if i did get an A), so don't take my word as law.
  7. Nov 5, 2006 #6
    I see, let me try and get more clarification on the 3rd question. As for the second, a was constant but I have to differentiate with respect to x for the i component. Would I use the source point or field? I considered a to be the source which is technically x so i showed that by differentiating with respect to a.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?