Electric potential in a uniform electric field

AI Thread Summary
Understanding electric potential in a uniform electric field involves recognizing that the electric field (E) is a vector quantity while electric potential (V) is scalar. To set up the integral of Eds, the limits of integration must align with the direction of the electric field, ensuring that the displacement vector ds is in the same direction. The equations Va-Vb = -∫E ds and Vb-Va = -∫E ds are equivalent, with the sign indicating the direction of ds relative to the electric field. Choosing the correct limits affects the sign of the integral, which is crucial for accurate calculations. With practice, the concepts will become clearer and easier to apply.
agirlsrepublic
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
k I am really confused about how to go about setting up the intergral of Eds. how do u choose the limits of integration and how do u know whether to write Va-Vb= -(integral) E ds
or Vb-Va = - (integral) E ds

its really frustrating me
i thought i understood but i realized i really dont
my teacher said something about choosing the direction of ds to be the same as the e field..but that doesn't help me much
im just confused

itd be really cool if someone could straighten this out
thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, realize that

\vec E = - \nabla V

(note the minus sign) and

\int_a^b \nabla V \cdot d\vec s = -\int_a^b \vec E \cdot d\vec s

or

V(b) - V(a) = -\int_a^b \vec E \cdot d \vec s

so your E ds is really \vec E \cdot d \vec s

That's what determines your signs.
 


First of all, don't worry, understanding the concept of electric potential in a uniform electric field can be confusing at first but with some practice, it will become clearer.

To set up the integral of Eds, we first need to understand that the electric potential (V) is a scalar quantity, meaning it only has magnitude and no direction. On the other hand, the electric field (E) is a vector quantity, meaning it has both magnitude and direction.

Now, in a uniform electric field, the electric field is constant in magnitude and direction throughout the field. This means that the direction of the electric field and the direction of ds (the infinitesimal displacement vector) will always be the same. Therefore, when setting up the integral, we need to choose the limits of integration in such a way that the direction of the displacement vector ds is the same as the direction of the electric field.

For example, if the electric field is directed from left to right, then the limits of integration should also be from left to right. This ensures that the direction of ds is the same as the direction of the electric field.

Now, coming to the equation Va-Vb= -(integral) E ds or Vb-Va = - (integral) E ds, both equations are essentially the same. The only difference is the sign in front of the integral. This sign simply indicates the direction of the displacement vector ds. If we choose the limits of integration in the direction of the electric field, then the sign in front of the integral will be positive. However, if we choose the limits in the opposite direction of the electric field, then the sign will be negative.

In summary, to set up the integral of Eds in a uniform electric field, we need to choose the limits of integration in the direction of the electric field and the sign in front of the integral will depend on the direction of the displacement vector ds. I hope this helps to clear up some of your confusion. Keep practicing and it will become easier to understand. Best of luck!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top