Electric potential of cylinder problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential of a solid cylinder with uniform charge density, focusing on a point outside the cylinder along its axis. Participants are exploring methods to find the potential at a specified distance from the origin.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss comparing the problem to finding the potential above a uniformly charged disk, suggesting the use of integration over concentric rings or disks. Others raise questions about the applicability of Gauss's Law for a finite cylinder and the implications of cylindrical symmetry.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on using Gauss's Law and integrating electric fields, while others express confusion regarding notations and the relationship between electrostatic potential energy and electric potential. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of varying cylinder dimensions and charge densities, as well as concerns about the limitations of using Gauss's Law for finite-length cylinders. Participants are also navigating notation differences, which may affect their understanding of the concepts involved.

azone
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A solid cylinder with radius R and length L has uniform charge density ro. Its base is in the x-y plane and it's axis is coincident with the z-axis (symmetrical about the z-axis)

Homework Equations



Find the electric potential at point P outside the cylinder at a distance z from the origin (P is on the z-axis)

The Attempt at a Solution



So I compared this to finding the potential at a distance z above a uniformly charged disk. In the case of a disk, I divided the disk into concentric rings, found the potential contribution due to one ring, and then integrated over all rings with the limits 0 to R.
I tried to use a similar argument and divide the cylinder into equal sized disks with radius R stacked on top of one another (so the only difference is the distance from the point P). I then want to integrate this over all disks with the limits 0 to z. So can I just use my answer for the potential above a charged disk, and then integrate it with respect to z to cover all the distances?
thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You idea sounds correct.
 
hi i have the same proplem but for height 2h and radius (a) and charge density ro inside and outside the cylinder and i tryed to use gauss's law and find fy the electric potential but I'm not sure can some one help.
i use
V(r)=- integrate E.da=E.2pi a (2h) =1/ebslon .Qenc
 
I would use Gauss's Law to find the E-vectors around and inside the cylinder, when remember that U=\int_{\infty}^r \vec{E}\bullet d\vec{l} and V=\frac{U}{q}.

A hint: Use a cylinder for your gaussian surface, with the same axis as your charged cylinder.
 
Thanks, but what you mean by U, is it the electric potential ?
I'm convusing between the notations !
 
Hi eman2009, I think espen180 is confusing electrostatic potential energy and electrostatic potential.

As for your original question, if the cylinder only has a finite length 2h, does it still have the requisite cylindrical symmetry to use Gauss' Law?

If not, you'll have to find the potential through another means...can you think of any formulas that directly relate potential to charge density?
 
how about

close INT E . da=1/ebsolon Qenc

as in Griffiths book(Introduction to Electrodynamic) p.68, equation 2.13
and
Q=INT RO dt t(tao) is the infinitesimal displacement

dt for cylinder

dt=4 pi R^2 dr
 
That's just Gauss' Law, and it is only useful in cases where symmetry allows you to pull E outside of the integral...is a cylinder of finite length one of those cases?

Instead, try equation 2.29, it directly relates rho to V.
 
eman2009 said:
Thanks, but what you mean by U, is it the electric potential ?
I'm convusing between the notations !

Sorry, I mistook your cylinder as one of infinite length. As for my notation, U is the electrostatic potential energy and V is the electric potential.
 
  • #10
espen180 said:
Sorry, I mistook your cylinder as one of infinite length. As for my notation, U is the electrostatic potential energy and V is the electric potential.

Sure, but wouldn't you also say

U(r)=-\int_{\infty}^r \vec{F}\bullet d\vec{l}\neq\int_{\infty}^r \vec{E}\bullet d\vec{l}

?:wink:
 
  • #11
Gah! You're right! Sorry about that. It should be an F, not an E.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K