Electrical Basics: Understand Physics & Learn Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter spank_fusion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basics Electrical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of understanding electrical physics concepts such as charges, forces, fields, and capacitance. The original poster seeks clarification on how these properties interrelate and which equations to apply in various scenarios. Several users recommend resources, including "Conceptual Physics" by Paul G. Hewitt and "Introduction to Electrodynamics" by David J. Griffith, for clearer explanations. They emphasize the importance of grasping fundamental concepts rather than just memorizing equations. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for effective learning materials to enhance comprehension in electrical physics.
spank_fusion
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Alright, I've learned a lot of electrical physics over the past month. So far, I know about charges, forces, fields, flux, potential, and capacitance. The problem is that I'm having a hard time visualizing how these properties relate to each other. I'm also having a lot of trouble knowing which equations to use in which situations. The book is a bit confusing, and I was wondering if anyone could help me understand these basics a little better or point me to a good learning reference. I would really, really appreciate it. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Try and get "Conceptual Physics" by Paul G.Hewitt published by Addison Wesley. He does an excellent job at making physics understandable (at a very basic level). I myself were brought up on "University Physics" by Sears, Zemansky and Young (first year university physics), which, if you have the patience to work through it, makes the concepts very clear.
 
It sounds like you're probably in one of the first year physics classes (usually for mostly engineering students) that forces you to learn by rote techniques: "Memorize this equation, use it in this situation, plug and chug."

I understand this is often a necessary "evil," but if you have a decent multivariable calculus background, I highly recommend David J. Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics."

It probably goes far beyond the scope of your course, but the first quarter to half of the book will do *wonders* to help your understanding of electrostatics and magnetostatics. You'll get to see why things are the way they are, and how certain conclusions were drawn.
He walks you through the math that allows you to truly understand E&M.
 
Book

Try this book "Physic for scientist and Engineers" by Raymond A. Serway, Robert Beichner. it will definitely help you out.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top