Electrical Charges and Attraction

AI Thread Summary
Two electrical charges with the same type but different voltages, such as -600VDC and -100VDC, will repel each other due to the principle that like charges repel. However, the discussion reveals confusion surrounding the terminology of "voltage" versus "charge," as charges are measured in Coulombs while voltage refers to electrical potential. The example provided involves a developing roller in an electrophotographic system, where toner is attracted to areas of lower charge on a photosensitive drum. This attraction occurs because the toner is influenced by the varying electric fields created by the differing voltages. Clarification on the terminology and underlying principles is essential for understanding the interactions between these charges.
csfyp.mail
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, Pls I'd like to find out if 2 electrical charges (same charge but different voltages) would attract or repel. For example -600VDC and -100VDC.

I've always thought like charges repel and unlike charges attract. But I'm reading up on something that says the above would attract and become -600VDC.

Pls can someone explain why this is the case. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
csfyp.mail said:
Hi, Pls I'd like to find out if 2 electrical charges (same charge but different voltages) would attract or repel. For example -600VDC and -100VDC.

I've always thought like charges repel and unlike charges attract. But I'm reading up on something that says the above would attract and become -600VDC.

Pls can someone explain why this is the case. Thanks

Welcome to the PF.

Charges do not have "voltage" as you have written. Charges are measured in units of Coulombs, and the electric fields that they cause will be the origin in changes in voltage (electrical potential).

Can you please copy the exact wording and figure from your textbook that have you confused?
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF.

Charges do not have "voltage" as you have written. Charges are measured in units of Coulombs, and the electric fields that they cause will be the origin in changes in voltage (electrical potential).

Can you please copy the exact wording and figure from your textbook that have you confused?


This is it...

"A metallic roller called the developing roller inside an EP cartridge acquires a – 600VDC charge (called a bias voltage) from the HVPS. The toner sticks to this roller because there is a magnet located inside the roller and because of the electrostatic charges between the toner and the developing roller. While the developing roller rotates toward the photo-sensitive drum, the toner acquires the charge of the roller (–600VDC). When the toner comes between the developing roller and the photosensitive drum, the toner is attracted to the areas that have been exposed by the laser (because these areas have a lesser charge, –100VDC). The toner also is repelled from the unexposed areas (because they are at the same –600VDC charge, and like charges repel)."


EP - Electrophotographic
HVPS - High Voltage Power Supply

Thanks
 
csfyp.mail said:
This is it...

"A metallic roller called the developing roller inside an EP cartridge acquires a – 600VDC charge (called a bias voltage) from the HVPS. The toner sticks to this roller because there is a magnet located inside the roller and because of the electrostatic charges between the toner and the developing roller. While the developing roller rotates toward the photo-sensitive drum, the toner acquires the charge of the roller (–600VDC). When the toner comes between the developing roller and the photosensitive drum, the toner is attracted to the areas that have been exposed by the laser (because these areas have a lesser charge, –100VDC). The toner also is repelled from the unexposed areas (because they are at the same –600VDC charge, and like charges repel)."


EP - Electrophotographic
HVPS - High Voltage Power Supply

Thanks

Ah, that makes more sense. They are using the word "charged" in the context of charging up the capacitances of the roller and drum. The charge on a capacitor is Q = C*V, where C is the capacitance, and V is the voltage.

The explanation is not very precisely worded, unfortunately. The explanation at wikipedia.org is better:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photocopier

.
 
Alright, Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top