Electrical Potential of Semicircle Insulating Wire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at the center of a semicircular insulating wire with a uniform charge distribution. The user successfully integrated the potential equation and arrived at the same answer as the solution manual, kQ/a. However, they are confused about the different methods used for integration, specifically the manual's approach of defining dq in terms of linear charge density. It is clarified that while both methods can yield the correct potential, the approach of integrating dq from zero to Q is valid for potential calculations but not for determining the electric field. Understanding when to use each method is essential for solving similar problems effectively.
stod
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A thin insulating rod is bent into a semicircular wire of radius a, with a total charge of Q distributed uniformly along the rod. Calculate the potential at the center of the curvature if the potential is assumed to be zero at infinity.


Homework Equations



V=ʃ (kdq/r)



The Attempt at a Solution



I integrated the equation from zero to Q, and my final answer was kQ/a, which was the same as the book's solution manual. My problem is, the solution manual did it a completely different and longer way, and I'm just wondering if my method is not valid (because the book does it the same way as me on some similar examples).

the book made dq=(lambda)dl, where lambda=Q/pi*a, and dl=a*dθ.
Then, after moving stuff around, the final integral looked like this:

integral(k*Q/pi*a)dθ, and they integrated from zero to pi.


I've spent a few hours trying to figure out why you can just integrate dq from zero to Q in some instances, while in other instances that seem very similar (like this) you have to make dq equal something. Or, did the book do this as a matter of preference, and it is okay to integrate dq from zero to Q in this instance? Please help clear up this extreme fogginess for me. Thank you in advance to anyone who can help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the case of potential you can use your method. Because the net potential is the scalar addition of potential due to dq. But if you want to find the electric field at the center, you cannot use this method.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top