Electriccal charges and vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rave Grrl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the horizontal and vertical components of the electrostatic force on a charge in a square configuration. The user initially calculated the horizontal component as 0.0013081 N and the vertical component as 4.321 N, but both were incorrect. There is confusion regarding the contributions from the charges, particularly the influence of the +2q and -2q charges. The user suggests that their calculations may be off by a factor of two and seeks clarification on the correct approach to account for the charges. The conversation highlights the need for clear equations to identify errors in the calculations.
Rave Grrl
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Code:
+q    -a-    -q

|            |
a            a
|            |

+2q   -a-  -2q
What are the horizontal and vertical components of the resultant electrostatic force on the charge in the lower left corner of the square if q = 0.9 10-7 C and a = 4.4 cm? (Assume the positive directions are upward and to the right.)


For the horizontal component I got .0013081 N and for the Vertical I got 4.321 N, but neither one is correct.

I found the charge between +2q and -2q, and then I added the charge from +2q to -q times cos(45). That should have given me the horizontal charge but it didn't. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your answer for the horizontal component is a factor of 2 off (that is my answer is twice the value of your answer), did you account for the 2q?

edit: if show your equations we can see exactly where an error occured
 
If your answer is .0026162 N that isn't correct either. I don't really know how to show the calculations here though.
 
The exact answer I got was .026626077 N, which is assuming that the positive direction is to the right. What does the book say the correct answer is?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top