- #1
- 822
- 2
Or, the combination of a chemical gradient and an electric gradient.
So suppose you have a postsynaptic membrane. The postsynaptic space is negatively charged, but it also has a huge number of Na+ ions relative to the extracellular space. So if you open up a channel, the electrical gradient is going to try to keep the Na+ inside. But the chemical gradient is going to drive some Na+ ions outside.
Does the chemical gradient simply act on the laws of diffusion/mere probability? Probability meaning that there are *far* more configurations with equal amounts of Na+ ions on both sides than one side having almost all of the Na+ ions?
And because of this, is the electrical gradient intrinsically "faster" than the chemical gradient? Diffusion is slow. But electric repulsion/attraction is very fast.
So suppose you have a postsynaptic membrane. The postsynaptic space is negatively charged, but it also has a huge number of Na+ ions relative to the extracellular space. So if you open up a channel, the electrical gradient is going to try to keep the Na+ inside. But the chemical gradient is going to drive some Na+ ions outside.
Does the chemical gradient simply act on the laws of diffusion/mere probability? Probability meaning that there are *far* more configurations with equal amounts of Na+ ions on both sides than one side having almost all of the Na+ ions?
And because of this, is the electrical gradient intrinsically "faster" than the chemical gradient? Diffusion is slow. But electric repulsion/attraction is very fast.