Electrodes Impedances: Replacement of Galvanometers

  • Thread starter Thread starter electronic engineer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrodes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the advancement in electromyography (EMG) technology through the replacement of galvanometers with high-gain amplifiers, enabling the use of smaller electrodes with higher impedances. This shift allows for the recording of smaller amplitude potentials generated by muscle contractions. The reference to the Biomedical Engineering Handbook emphasizes the historical context of this development in instrumentation. The use of active amplifiers in EMG has been recognized as a significant improvement since 1929, facilitating the application of smaller needles for electrode placement. Overall, this transition marks a crucial evolution in the field of EMG.
electronic engineer
Messages
145
Reaction score
3
I need a clarify for this statement:

Replacement of galvanometers with high-gain amplifiers allowed smaller electrodes with higher impedances to be used and potentials of smaller amplitudes to be recorded .
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Reference please. What type of electrodes?
 
I googled the whole phrase, and got a hit on the Biomedical Engineering Handbook, Chapter 14 on Electrodes -- "Principals of Electromyography":

http://books.google.com/books?id=6b...&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result

It's about the history of the instrumentation used for Electromyography (EMG), which is measuring the electical potentials generated from muscle contractions.

So to electronic engineer, yes, using an active amplifier instead of just a passive galvanometer was a nice advance in EMG technology in 1929. You can use smaller needles (EMG electrodes) when you use active amplifiers. Kinda' ancient history, though...
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top