Electrodynamics of a moving particle

fuchini
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There is a charged particle (charge=q) moving on the x-axis such that x(t)=A\,sin(\omega t). Prove that:
\int <\rho>\,dV=q

Homework Equations


We have the following equations:
<\rho>=\frac{1}{T} \int_0^T \rho\, dt

Where T=\frac{2 \pi}{\omega}

The Attempt at a Solution



So for this particle we have the following charge density \rho=q\,\delta(z)\delta(y)\delta(x-A\,sin(\omega t)) therefore:

<\rho>=\frac{\omega}{2\pi}q\,\delta(z)\delta(y) \int_0^T \delta(x-A\,sin(\omega t))\,dt

However, we know that \delta(f(t))=\sum \frac{\delta(t-t_i)}{|f^\prime (t_i)|} for every root of f(t). So we have \delta(x-A\,sin(\omega t))=\delta(x/A-sin(\omega t))/|A| where f(t)=x/A-sin(\omega t).

Considering the integral is over one period I'll only take one root into account:

\delta(x-A\,sin(\omega t))=\frac{1}{|A|}\frac{\delta(t-sin^{-1}(x/A)/\omega)}{\omega cos(sin^{-1}(x/A))}=\frac{\sqrt{A^2-x^2}}{\omega}\delta(t-sin^{-1}(x/A)/\omega)

Then, the average value is:

<\rho>=\frac{\sqrt{A^2-x^2}}{\omega}\frac{\omega}{2\pi}q\,\delta(z)\delta(y) \int_0^T \delta(t-sin^{-1}(x/A)/\omega)\,dt=\frac{\sqrt{A^2-x^2}}{2\pi}q\,\delta(z)\delta(y)

Finally we have:

<\rho>=\int \frac{\sqrt{A^2-x^2}}{2\pi}q\,\delta(z)\delta(y)\, dV =\frac{q}{2\pi}\int \sqrt{A^2-x^2}\,dx

This is as far as I go, please help me if there is any mistake and how can I get the final result. Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fuchini said:

Homework Statement


There is a charged particle (charge=q) moving on the x-axis such that x(t)=A\,sin(\omega t). Prove that:
\int <\rho>\,dV=q


Homework Equations


We have the following equations:
<\rho>=\frac{1}{T} \int_0^T \rho\, dt

Where T=\frac{2 \pi}{\omega}

The Attempt at a Solution



So for this particle we have the following charge density \rho=q\,\delta(z)\delta(y)\delta(x-A\,sin(\omega t)) therefore:

<\rho>=\frac{\omega}{2\pi}q\,\delta(z)\delta(y) \int_0^T \delta(x-A\,sin(\omega t))\,dt

However, we know that \delta(f(t))=\sum \frac{\delta(t-t_i)}{|f^\prime (t_i)|} for every root of f(t). So we have \delta(x-A\,sin(\omega t))=\delta(x/A-sin(\omega t))/|A| where f(t)=x/A-sin(\omega t).

Considering the integral is over one period I'll only take one root into account:

\delta(x-A\,sin(\omega t))=\frac{1}{|A|}\frac{\delta(t-sin^{-1}(x/A)/\omega)}{\omega cos(sin^{-1}(x/A))}=\frac{\sqrt{A^2-x^2}}{\omega}\delta(t-sin^{-1}(x/A)/\omega)
[/itex]
But x is itself a function of time. In the following steps you proceed as if x was a time independent parameter.

The easy (and only way, I think) to do it is to do the volume integral before doing the time integral. Then the calculation is trivial.
 
Thanks a lot! It's far easier that way. I have one final question, does this hold:

\int f(x) \delta(x^\prime-x(t)) dx^\prime=f(x(t))

Thanks again.
 
fuchini said:
Thanks a lot! It's far easier that way. I have one final question, does this hold:

\int f(x) \delta(x^\prime-x(t)) dx^\prime=f(x(t))

Thanks again.

Yes, that's correct. To see this, just imagine picking a certain value of t. Then it is obviously true at that time. But it must be true for any value of t so it is a valid relation even given that x(t) is a function of time.

You are welcome:cool:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top