Electromagnetic cascade in a calorimeter

Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A calorimeter is made from layers of lead (1.75mm thick) alternated with layers of scintillator. The radiation length ##X_0## of lead is ##0.64cm##.

In an EM shower the number of particles doubles and the energy of each particle halves per radiation length travelled. The shower stops when critical energy ##E_c## is reached. For lead ##E_c## is 9.6MeV. Estimate the calorimeter thickness required to completely contain a shower caused by a 10GeV electron. Neglect interactions in the scintillator.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know a calorimeter has to have scintillator as the first and last layers. So if there are n layers of scintillator, there will be n-1 layers of lead.

Based on the information given. I'm thinking the equation should be something like
##E = \frac{E_0}{2^{t/X_0}}##
Where t is the thickness of lead the shower travels through. Then thickness would be ##(0.175t) \times 0.4(t+1)##. Is that ok? Or do I need to somehow include the doubling in particle number in there?

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kara386 said:
I know a calorimeter has to have scintillator as the first and last layers.
It does not have to. Is there a scintillator thickness given? Otherwise you can just calculate the required length of lead.

Your second expression grows quadratically with t, that cannot be right. Did you mean "+"? Where does the 0.4 come from?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top