Electromagnetic wave equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves verifying that specific equations for electric and magnetic fields, E and B, are solutions to given electromagnetic wave equations. The equations are expressed in terms of cosine functions with parameters related to wave properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss taking partial derivatives of the equations for E and B to verify their validity as solutions. There are inquiries about the relationships between parameters like k, ω, μ₀, and ε₀, as well as how these relate to the wave equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their derivative calculations and are exploring the implications of these results. There is a suggestion to equate certain expressions derived from the wave equations, and some participants are confirming the relationships between the constants involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of detailed guidance from the textbook and instructor regarding the verification process, leading to questions about the approach and assumptions made in the problem.

drdizzard
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
The problem states: Verify by substitution that the following equations are solutions to equations 34.8 and 34.9 respectively.

E=E(max)cos[kx-wt]

B=B(max)cos[kx-wt]

Equations 34.8 and 34.9 are provided in the attachment along with the problem itself as stated in the textbook.

I'm not really sure where to begin with this problem. The instructor and the book didn't give much info regarding how to do it.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I tried to take the first and second partials of E and B with respect to x and t but it just doesn't seem to get me where I think the problem wants me to go, any help in the right direction would be appreciated.
 
Can you show what happened when you took the derivatives? It's a strightforward problem- simple crank-turning.
 
The partial of E with respect to x is equivalent to -kE(max)sin[kx-wt]
The second partial with respect to x is equal to -k(squared)E(max)cos[kx-wt]

Partial E with respect to t is -wE(max)sin[kx-wt]
Second partial of E with respect to t is -w(squared)E(max)cos[kx-wt]

The first and second partials of B with respect to x are the same as E with E(max) replaced by B(max).

The same is true of the first and second partials of B with repect to t.
 
Hi drdizzard,

In your derivatives you have k, \omega, \mu_0, and \epsilon_0. What is \omega/k equal to? What about the product \mu_0\epsilon_0 that appears in the wave equation?
 
w/k is equal to c (speed of light/electromagnetic waves in vacuum).

the product of mu and epsilon is equivalent to 1/c^2

So to verify you take the second partial of E with respect to x and set it equal to the product of mu, epsilon, and the second partial of E with respect to t?
 
drdizzard said:
w/k is equal to c (speed of light/electromagnetic waves in vacuum).

the product of mu and epsilon is equivalent to 1/c^2

So to verify you take the second partial of E with respect to x and set it equal to the product of mu, epsilon, and the second partial of E with respect to t?

The wave equation says they must be equal; to verify it in this case you set the two sides equal and show that the equality is always true. (For example, if you do a series of algebraic steps and end up with something like 1=1, then that is always true.)
 
I did all the work according to what I think I'm supposed to do with it and its in the attachment.

I came out with c=c for both E and B
 

Attachments

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K