Electromagnetism - Boundary conditions for Polarization field at interface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the electrostatic boundary conditions for a polarization field \( P \) at the interface between two media with relative permittivities \( \varepsilon_{r1} \) and \( \varepsilon_{r2} \). The user successfully applies concepts from Feynman's Lectures, specifically Volume 2, Chapter 33-3, to establish the boundary conditions. Key equations include \( D = \varepsilon_0 E + P \) and the derived conditions \( P_{x2} - P_{x1} = -\varepsilon_0 (E_{x2} - E_{x1}) \), along with continuity conditions for the electric field \( E \) and magnetic field \( B \). The user seeks verification of their derivation and the appropriateness of substituting \( P \) in the boundary conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and boundary conditions in electromagnetism.
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations and their implications for electric and magnetic fields.
  • Knowledge of polarization fields and relative permittivities in dielectric materials.
  • Ability to manipulate partial derivatives and integrals in the context of electromagnetic theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electrostatic boundary conditions in "Feynman's Lectures on Physics, Volume 2".
  • Research the implications of bound volume charge density \( \rho_b \) in dielectric materials.
  • Explore the mathematical treatment of polarization fields in different media using boundary conditions.
  • Learn about the applications of boundary conditions in optical systems and wave propagation.
USEFUL FOR

Students of electromagnetism, physicists working with dielectric materials, and engineers involved in optical system design will benefit from this discussion.

lmcelroy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Not actually a homework question, this is a question from a past exam paper (second year EM and optics):

Homework Statement



Use a Gaussian surface and Amperian loop to derive the electrostatic boundary conditions for a polarization field P at an interface between media 1 and 2 with relative permittivities εr1 and εr2.


Homework Equations




D = ε0E + P,

\nabla.P = -ρb

where D is the displacement field, E the electric field and ρb the bound volume charge density.

The Attempt at a Solution



Lack of a solution is the reason for posting?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, after obtaining a copy of Feynman's lectures and referring to Volume 2, Chapter 33-3, I think I have found a solution.

Treating the boundary as a separate region (media 3 with a relative permittivity that begins at εr1 and changes continuously to εr2) then since the P field is different in each region, in region 3 (the boundary) there is a \deltaPx/\deltax where Px is the P field in the x direction. So;

d/dx (Dx) = d/dx ( (ε0Ex) + (P)) ... (partial derivatives with respect to x [can't use latex very well]

D doesn't change in materials so:

-d/dx (Exε0) = d/dx (Px)

Integrating each side with respect to x over region 3 and letting P2 be the polarisation in εr2 region and P1.. :

Px2-Px1 = -ε0(Ex2 - Ex1)


Also there is no B divergence from Maxwell so:
B1 = B2 (for all directions)

Also from Maxwell:

curl(E) = -dB/dt (again partials)

Which gives the following set:

dEz/dy -dEy/dz = -dBx/dt
dEz/dx - dEx/dz = -dBy/dt
dEy/dx - dEx/dy = -dBz/dt

The E field only changes in the direction so only the following is considered:

dEz/dx = -dBy/dt
dEy/dx = -dBz/dt

Now if E were to change the right hand side of the equation would have to be balanced by a change of B with respect to time which does not happen so:

Ez1 = Ez2 and Ey1 = Ey2

So I have the boundary conditions of a dielectric interface. The boundary conditions on P are then just found by substituting P = E(εr-1)ε0:

(1) Px2-Px1 = -ε0(Ex2 - Ex1)
Px2 - Px1 = (-Px2/(εr2-1))+(Px1/(εr1-1))
Px1εr1 / (εr1-1) = Px2εr2 / (εr2-1)

(2) B1 = B2

(3) (P1/(εr1-1))y = (P2/(εr2-1))y

(4) (P1/(εr1-1))z = (P2/(εr2-1))z


Hoping someone can verify this for me. Fairly sure about the derivation of boundary conditions; it is essentially Feynman's derivation modified for two materials (he does it for vacuum to material).

However, not sure if the substitution of P is the right thing to do - does this form constitute an answer to the question or is it asking something else?

Again thanks in advance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K