Electromagnetism, calculation of B

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force on a small circular conductor within a magnetized iron plate with a hole. The magnetization is described by a specific function, leading to bound charges on the plate's surfaces. The participant identifies that only the magnetic field component in the s direction contributes to the force, while the z component appears to not provide a net force due to symmetry. However, confusion arises as the z component is ultimately deemed responsible for the net force. The participant seeks clarification on this apparent contradiction in their understanding of the magnetic interactions.
usn7564
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A very big iron plate with the thickness 2h have, far from the plates edges, had a hole with the radius a drilled through it. With respect to the holes axis of symmetry the plate has a magnetization

\bar{M} = M_0 \frac{a}{s} \hat{s}

where s is the distance from the axis of symmetry.

In the hole, centered around the axis there is a small circular conductor with the current I with radius b << a.

Find the force on the conductor.

The Attempt at a Solution



I went ahead and found the bound charges which proved to be only on the top and bottom surfaces which proved to be

\bar{K} = M_0 \frac{a}{s} -\hat{\phi} for the upper surface and the same in the reversed direction for the lower.

Now with simply the right hand rule I concluded that the only B which will give a net force is the one in the s direction (giving a force in the z direction). The force from phi disappears in the cross product of biot savart, the force from z disappears due to symmetry. Then using with the knowledge that the only force that matters is the z component of the force:

\bar{F} = \Delta(\bar{m} \cdot \bar{B}) = \bar{m} \cdot \frac {d \bar{B}}{dz}\hat{z}

So I get that due to m being dotted with B only the z component survives of B, but I also concluded that the z component of B would not give a net force. Yet it ends up being the only one that gives a net force? There's something I'm misunderstanding 100% here.

and seems my tophats aren't working, but they're the unit vectors
 

Attachments

  • hole.png
    hole.png
    2.8 KB · Views: 449
  • B.png
    B.png
    10.1 KB · Views: 421
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For hats use \hat instead of \^.
 
Last edited:
dauto said:
for hats use \hat instead of \^.
That worked, thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top