Electromagnetism direction rule

AI Thread Summary
To determine the direction of current in electromagnetism, one must understand the relationship between the original magnetic field and its rate of change. The induced electromotive force (εmf) opposes the change in the magnetic field, as stated in Lenz's Law. When calculating current direction, it is crucial to differentiate between the strength of the magnetic field and the strength of its rate of change, as they can point in different directions. The induced current will create its own magnetic field that opposes the original change. This understanding is key to solving problems involving current direction without a force present.
Jabababa
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



#45
What is the magnitude and the direction of the current?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to get the magnitude but i don't get the current direction...how do i find out which way the current goes?

What is the general rule to find the direction of current or magnetic field without a force? I know how to do it with all 3 but sometimes they only give me the current and the magnetic field direction but not force.
 

Attachments

  • 111111.png
    111111.png
    12.7 KB · Views: 487
Physics news on Phys.org
The direction of the induced εmf is such that it opposes the direction of the change in the original magnetic field. This is where the negative sign comes from in Lenz's Law.

While that's the official answer, I empathize that it might still be confusing. (εmf is endless source of confusion for almost everybody.)

So let me phrase it another way. This way is less elegant, but hopefully more insightful. But first we must make a distinction of our terms.

When you calculated the magnitude, you already made the distinction between the original magnetic field and the rate of change of the original magnetic field. They are two different things, and can be -- and often are -- in completely different directions (and can be -- and often are -- in the same direction). My point here is that making the distinction between strength of the field and strength of the rate of change of the field is an important distinction to make.

Moving on...

You know that a changing field will induce an εmf in the wire loop. That εmf will cause a current to flow through the wire if the circuit is closed (like it is here). That current will induce a magnetic field of its own (through the same loop). And (...here's the important part...) the direction of that induced magnetic field is in the opposite direction of the rate of change of the original magnetic field. I think that's the general rule you're looking for.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top