Why is the Dirac Delta Function in the Charge Density Solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter richard7893
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
richard7893
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the electric potential of some configuration of charge is given by the expression:

V(r)= (Ae^(-pr))/(r)

where A and p are constants. Find the E-field E(r), the charge density rho(r) and total charge Q. The answer for rho is given in book as:
epsilon-not * A * ((1/r)4* pi* dirac delta^3 (r) - p^(2) e^(-p*r))
(The stuff inside parentheses is all divided by r


Homework Equations


-del V= E; del dot E = rho/epsilon-not ;



The Attempt at a Solution


I the took gradient of V using sperical coordinates using the formula
-del V= E

to obtain E.

Then I used the formula

del dot E = rho/epsilon-not

to find rho. I am not getting the same rho as in the book. I don't understand why the dirac delta function is in the answer. Do you have to perform an integration or am I taking a wrong apprach all together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show how you got your volume charge density? What equation did you strart from?
 
the formula for obtaing rho goes thru this eqn:

del dot E = rho/epsilon-not

Del dot E in sperical coords. is : (1/r^2) d/dr [ r^2 V(r)] (the (1/r^2) and r^2 are built into the formula.) once i did this multipled both sides by epsioln-not to obtain rho. This question is from Grifiths electrodynamics book ed. 5 problem 2.46
 
Then what did you do? When you took the derivatives, did you say

\frac{r^2}{r^2}\frac{dV}{dr}=\frac{dV}{dr}\;?

How justified are you in canceling out the r2 terms at r = 0? That's where the Dirac delta function comes in.
 
http://s22.photobucket.com/albums/b317/richard7893/?action=view&current=emag.jpg"
This is what I have so far if you click on the link. Can I cancel out the r^2 terms in the differential? Or do I distribute the r^2 in the numerator and then perform the differential? How can I insert a dirac delta function? If I cancel out the r^2 in the differential I don't get the same answer as the book.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the charge distribution has no singularity (does not blow up) as r goes to zero, then you can cancel the r2 in the numerator and denominator and proceed merrily on your way. If there is a singularity, then you essentially have "zero divided by zero". You know that in this case there is a singularity because the electric field goes to infinity as r goes to zero. This means a point charge at the origin which requires a Dirac delta function in the volume charge density.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top