Electromagnetism: Questions About Energy Density

Gavins
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hey I am studying electromagnetism at the moment and one problem I'm having is the energy density.
Instead of typing everything out, this pdf has everything. http://www.physics.sfsu.edu/~lea/courses/ugrad/360notes11.pdf There are some things I don't understand. Why is the surface integral 0? He just says that it's 0 for the usual reasons. Then I'm not sure what he's doing with the (deltaD). E thing. I don't understand how he puts the whole thing in the delta and then a half pops out.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think he is just using the usual product rule to get the half:
\Delta (E \cdot E)=\Delta E \cdot E + E \cdot \Delta E = 2(\Delta E\cdot E)
\Rightarrow \Delta E\cdot E = \frac{1}{2} \Delta (E \cdot E)

As for the integral being zero, I'm not sure, perhaps it's zero in the limit.
 
You must be having so much fun, i love the book of Griffiths;
now, he used D because he is dealing with dielectric metarial, there you should not consider bounded charges since they are not cause but result.
div(D)=Pf but div(E)=P (here since i don't have rho, P is charge density) if you use E you can not undrestand if the thing you got is either free or bounded.
Zorba is right, USUALLY V is zero at the infinity, so first integral vanishes.
As you continue, you don't have to be afraid of confusing E or D because from now on you won't deal with charge any more, you can convert D to k€E then as you have same variable in delta or d, you can tell d(E^2)=2EdE, or the reverse.
After all if you like it this way you may not touch it and have some k€ there or you can convert it back and have ½ED
 
"Why is the surface integral 0? He just says that it's 0 for the usual reasons."

the electric displacement D vector as you go to infinity is proportional to 1/r^2 and the potential is a 1/r. the dA has a r^2 term in it. therefore making the whole term in the integral a 1/r, hence as you go out to infinity(integrating over all of space), the surface integral goes to zero
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top