Electron in a uniform electric field.

AI Thread Summary
An electron accelerating upwards in a uniform electric field indicates that the electric field direction is downward. To calculate the electric field, the formula E = k|q|/d^2 is applicable, but it pertains to point charges rather than uniform fields. The distance 'd' should be interpreted based on the context of the problem, and using acceleration to find force is a valid approach. The user confirms understanding and questions the validity of their final answer, which is 8.54 * 10^(-18), expressing concern over its magnitude. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying formulas and understanding the nature of electric fields in calculations.
evgeniy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
First, am I correct on this: If an electron is accelerating upwards in a uniform electric field, then the electric field's direction is pointed opposite, or downwards, right? And to calculate the magnitude and direction of the electric field, I just use the formula

E= k|q|/d^2

The question is: the d, is it the distance from where it starts to where it stops? I ask this because I am aslo given that the acceleration is 4.5m in the first 3 micro-seconds. SO should I divide 3micro-s by 4.5 to find what the d is after 1 s?
Or did I get all this wrong?

Another thing: Can I use the definition of electric field and use : a = F/m or

a = eE/m ? since I know the charge and the mass and the acceleration?
THanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first sentence is right. But the first formula you gave is for the field of a point particle (at a distance d), while in this problem there is a uniform electric field, like the one set up between the plates of a large parellel plate capacitor. You don't have to worry about the source of the field, though. Just use the acceleration to find the force on the electron and get the field from this, like you suggested at the end.
 
Okay I got it. But my final answer is 8.54 * 10^(-18), isn't it too small? Or am I correct?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top