Electron Phasepositive and negative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rabbitweed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Negative
rabbitweed
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
EDIT: This may be better in the Chemistry forum, I'm really not sure.

I'm just doing some basic qualitative MO theory for my first year chemistry class, and i am becoming quite confused.

My text says shows your typical 'dumbbell' model of a p orbital, each a different colour, and states "The two lobes of the p orbitals are of opposite phase."...without actually explaining what phase is.

Is phase just another name for it's orientation along an x y z axis, or does it have to do with the magnetic moment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the "dumbbell" model of the p orbital, the size and shape of lobe is related to the probability of finding the electron at that angular location. It's a bit more complicated, because, strictly speaking, the value at any given point on the surface is actually a complex number, where the phase refers to the complex phase at that point. The dumbell surface actually represents the angular part of the wave function describing the electron in that orbital, which is a complex number in general.

If you start at some point on one lobe, and rotate around by 180 degrees such that you're on the other lobe, this new point will have opposite sign from the point you started at.

If you're familiar with the idea of phase shifts when talking about sine and cosine functions, then you can see how a shift of 180 degrees causes the point to flip sign. It's kinda like that in this case.
 
ah, so it's purely a spatial thing. Thanks, I think I get it now.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top