Electron-positron creation from colliding photons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the final energies and velocities of an electron-positron pair created from the collision of two photons with energies of 2 MeV and 3 MeV. Participants suggest switching to a center-of-mass frame where the photons have equal energy to simplify calculations. Confusion arises regarding the use of four-vectors and whether to add or subtract momenta due to the photons traveling in opposite directions. Clarifications indicate that the momenta should be combined with one photon having negative momentum. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the principles of relativistic energy and momentum in the analysis.
chem_heather
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider two photons, one with energy ε1 = 2MeV traveling to the right, and the other with energy ε2 = 3MeV moving tot he left. The two photons collide head-on and produce a positron-electron pair. Suppose the the electron and positron move along the same axis as the photons.

What are the final energies (Ee- and Ee+) and velocities (ve- and ve+) of the positron and the electron?

(Hint: it is easier to do this problem by first switching to a frame of reference where the two photons have the same energy (and thus same momentum); in this frame, after the collision the center of mass is at rest.)

Homework Equations


ε1 = 2 MeV
ε2 = 3 MeV
me = 0.511 MeV/c2
p = ϒmv
E = ϒmc2 = mc2 + EK = mc2 + mc2(ϒ-1)
E = √[(pc)2 + (mc2)2]
ϒ = 1/√1-(v2/c2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I set up four frames of reference (FORs):
E: lab frame, before collision
E' : lab frame, after collision
Ecp: Center-of -mass frame before collision
E'cp: Center-of -mass frame after collision

E = c(p1 + p2) = 5MeV
E'cp = 2mec2
E' = 2mec2 + EK

I know that the norms of the energies will be equal from one FOR to another, so:
E2 = (E'cp)2
(E'cp)2 = 25 MeV2

And this is where I'm stuck. We've covered four-vectors, and I think I might be getting confused on whether or not I use them here, and if so, how to set up the components for the photons.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your notation is confusing. If E are energies, they cannot be frames. Also, squaring the energy does not give anything invariant. You'll need the 4-vectors of the particles involved.
 
That's where I'm getting confused. Would the 4-vector for the lab frame before the collision be P = (0,c(p1 + p2),0,0)? I used 0 in the A0 spot because the photons don't have any rest-mass. And for the center-of-mass frame after the collision be P'cp = (2mec2,0,0,0)? When I use these, P2 = 25 MeV2.

Is there a way to do this without using 4-vectors?
 
Hmm, I just found this on another thread:
"Since m=0, combining those two gives the four-momentum of a photon as:
(|p|,p)
or equivalently for a photon traveling in the x direction:
(E/c,E/c,0,0)"

So, if that's the case, the 4-vector for the lab-frame before the collision would be
P = (c(p1 + p2),c(p1 + p2),0,0), correct? Or do the momentums need to be subtracted since they're going in opposite directions?​
 
chem_heather said:
That's where I'm getting confused. Would the 4-vector for the lab frame before the collision be P = (0,c(p1 + p2),0,0)? I used 0 in the A0 spot because the photons don't have any rest-mass. And for the center-of-mass frame after the collision be P'cp = (2mec2,0,0,0)? When I use these, P2 = 25 MeV2.
No, and guessing does not help.
chem_heather said:
Or do the momentums need to be subtracted since they're going in opposite directions?
They have to be added, but one photon needs a negative momentum as it is going in the opposite direction (-x direction).
Is there a way to do this without using 4-vectors?
There is, but that needs significantly more work.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top