Electronic parallel voltage sources exercises?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding exercises related to circuits with parallel voltage sources, with participants sharing problems and seeking solutions. One user expresses difficulty in locating suitable exercises online, prompting others to provide circuit problems for practice. The conversation delves into the differences between voltage and current sources, emphasizing the importance of understanding these concepts for solving circuit problems. Participants discuss strategies for applying Kirchhoff's laws and calculating currents in various circuit configurations. Overall, the thread highlights the collaborative effort to enhance understanding of electrical circuits and problem-solving techniques.
  • #31
Femme_physics said:
Going back to this:

Io is in fact the current that flows in all across the last circuit I made, right?

Though I recognize it splits here


when it gets back to point a, does it kinda recombine and spits again? I'm not sure how to explain it...

Do you know what I mean?

When you merge the resistors, you can't "see" Io anymore.
You can calculate the voltage drop and the total current though.
Afterward you have to go back to the original circuit to find Io.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Forgot to answer
What's so confusing about it?
Or is it just that you didn't see it before?

Yes, it's because I've never seen it before.

I do know that mA means miliampere! I just wanted to know to which it belongs, and now you say it belongs to neither..

so those blue arrows are ANOTHER 3 unknowns?

http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/2659/bluecw.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #33
I like Serena said:
When you merge the resistors, you can't "see" Io anymore.
You can calculate the voltage drop and the total current though.
Afterward you have to go back to the original circuit to find Io.
I see, so after I find Itotal, I find V. And after I find V I just doV/R1 to find IoYes?
 
  • #34
Well, they are not all really "unknown" are they?
I think the leftmost one is 6 mA, don't you?
That doesn't sound "unknown" to me.
 
  • #35
Femme_physics said:
I see, so after I find Itotal, I find V. And after I find V I just do


V/R1 to find Io


Yes?

No, you will have to use KCL to find Io.
 
  • #36
I like Serena said:
Well, they are not all really "unknown" are they?
I think the leftmost one is 6 mA, don't you?
That doesn't sound "unknown" to me.

Oh, right *smacks forehead*


I like Serena said:
No, you will have to use KCL to find Io.


Alright, I see, give me a few moments to try and solve it...be right back with a scan
 
  • #37
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #38
I like Serena said:
Well, they are not all really "unknown" are they?
I think the leftmost one is 6 mA, don't you?
That doesn't sound "unknown" to me.

Good point! lol... that was kinda silly of me.

Okay then... should be easy ...hope I'm not oversimplifying it (which I tend to do)...

http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/6847/600il.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #39
Femme_physics said:
Well I'd hate to start solving this 5 eq 5 unknown thing, but this is it right? I mean, this is what it boils down to?

PS Maybe a mod can move this topic to the homework section?

You can do it this way, but I think you would prefer the "smooth ride".

After calculating I_total, don't go back right away to your original circuit, but take the top diagram you drew in your scan, where you have 2 merged resistors.

There you can determine the voltage drop to the middle.

Only then, go back to the original circuit and calculate all the currents with Ohm's law.

Then, finally apply KCL to find Io.
 
Last edited:
  • #40
I like Serena said:
You can do it this way, but I think you would prefer the "smooth ride".

After calculating I_total, don't go back right away to your original circuit, but take the top diagram you drew in your scan, where you have 2 merged resistors.

There you can determine the voltage drop to the middle.

Only then, go back to the original circuit and calculate all the currents with Ohm's law.

Much easier indeed! Well, I doubt we'd have somethign that difficult on the test thankfuly, and speak of the devil... I'm off to college in a jiffy :smile: wish me luck

XoX

Edit: Actually I don't want too early, I'll try and solve it
 
  • #41
Femme_physics said:
Good point! lol... that was kinda silly of me.

Okay then... should be easy ...hope I'm not oversimplifying it (which I tend to do)...

No, that won't work.

In your loop (a) you treat the current source of 3 mA as a voltage source of 3 V.
But that is not right.
The corresponding voltage drop is unknown.
 
  • #42
I like Serena said:
You can do it this way, but I think you would prefer the "smooth ride".

After calculating I_total, don't go back right away to your original circuit, but take the top diagram you drew in your scan, where you have 2 merged resistors.

There you can determine the voltage drop to the middle.

Only then, go back to the original circuit and calculate all the currents with Ohm's law.

Then, finally apply KCL to find Io.


http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/9089/wttt.jpg


Uhh...okay what am I doing wrong? O_o

btw got less than 30 minutes:rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #43
I wish you luck! :smile:
 
  • #44
Femme_physics said:
Uhh...okay what am I doing wrong? O_o

btw got less than 30 minutes:rolleyes:

Go back to the original circuit.

Now you have the voltage drop between a and b, so you can calculate the currents through the left and right resistor.

Same for b and the bottom.
 
  • #46
Femme_physics said:
Well this is my last attempt due to time shortage but I don't see how I find Io in any of this:

Good!
Do the same between a and b to find I1 and I2.


Aftward apply KCL at point B to find Io.
 
  • #47
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #49
:smile:

It seems that thread didn't have such a smooth ride!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K