Electrons are not elementary particles?

Physics news on Phys.org
Nav said:
http://www.nature.com/news/not-quite-so-elementary-my-dear-electron-1.10471
Scientists have split an electron into 3 quasiparticles in the lab, why isn't this updated on the standard model?

It's says so right there in the second paragraph of your link:

Isolated electrons cannot be split into smaller components, earning them the designation of a fundamental particle.

See also, the definition of "quasi":

quasi- Being partly or almost: quasicrystalline

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/quasi-[/URL]

So these quasiparticles aren't actually 'real' particles in the standard model sense, but are emergent from the behaviour of electrons in solids or collections of atoms. There are a lot of quasiparticles - the notion of the 'phonon' is probably the most important/famous one - modes of vibration in the crystal lattice. [URL='[PLAIN]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_quasiparticles']https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_quasiparticles[/URL]
[/URL]
ETA: wikipedia link [URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasiparticle[/URL]

[QUOTE]In physics, [B]quasiparticles[/B] and [B]collective excitations[/B] (which are closely related) are emergent phenomena that occur when a microscopically complicated system such as a solid behaves [I]as if[/I] it contained different weakly interacting particles in free space. For example, as an electron travels through a semiconductor, its motion is disturbed in a complex way by its interactions with all of the other electrons and nuclei; however it [I]approximately[/I] behaves like an electron with a [I]different mass[/I] traveling unperturbed through free space. This "electron" with a different mass is called an "electron quasiparticle".[1] In another example, the aggregate motion of electrons in the valence band of a semiconductor is the same as if the semiconductor contained instead positively charged quasiparticles called holes. Other quasiparticles or collective excitations include phonons (particles derived from the vibrations of atoms in a solid), plasmons (particles derived from plasma oscillations), and many others.[/QUOTE]

Think of them as convenient ways to deal with quantum many body dynamics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, vanhees71, DrClaude and 1 other person
Well, these are called quasiparticles for a reason. This has more to do with the weirdness of the quantum world than the electron not being a fundamental particle. See this.
 
Nav said:
http://www.nature.com/news/not-quite-so-elementary-my-dear-electron-1.10471
Scientists have split an electron into 3 quasiparticles in the lab, why isn't this updated on the standard model?
To use an analogy from everyday life, this is not much different from spliting a man into a naked man and his clothes. The electron-experiment above has no more implications for the standard model than my man-experiment has for biology.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top