Electrostatic: Electron Transfer & Conductivity

AI Thread Summary
Rubbing two electrically neutral insulators together results in one becoming positively charged and the other negatively charged due to electron transfer. The transfer is influenced by the electron affinities of the materials, but conductivity also plays a role in how charges are managed. A misconception arose regarding the relationship between conductivity and electron affinity, as some high-conductivity materials like gold and silver also possess high electron affinity. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the distinction between charging by friction and charging by induction or conduction. Overall, further research is encouraged to clarify these concepts and foster better understanding.
Tam Le
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
If you rub two electrically neutral pieces of insulation together, one piece becomes charged and the other piece becomes oppositely charged.

Does this transfer of electron depend merely on the electron affinities of the two pieces, or does the conductivity of the two insulations play a part?

I imagine a poor insulator (high conductivity) to have a lower electron affinity; it wants to move/get rid of its electrons. Likewise, I imagine a good insulator (low conductivity) to have a higher electron affinity; it wants to hold onto its electrons.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thank you for replying meBigGuy.

After reading your link and others, I think I cleared the confusion: I thought that since conductors are good at moving charges throughout them, they must also be good at transferring their charges. Hence, I thought that if I rubbed two different, electrically neutral, nonpolarized materials together, the better conducting material would conduct its electrons to the poorer conducting material, thus eliminating the electron affinity explanation. However, I completely forgot to factor in that nonpolarized and electrically neutral part, which would interfere with charge transfer. I basically attempted to explain charging by friction with charging by induction and conduction.

I also thought that electron affinity was somehow inversely proportional to conductivity. But, after not much research, I found that was not the case: Au and Ag, for example, have both high electron affinity and high conductivity.

To conclude, I should have done more research before posting this question; I admit my ignorance :sorry:.
 
But, feel free to ask about anything in your research that you have a problem understanding. We love getting questions. Demonstrate a little effort and you will get responses from people who like to help. It just that it is very difficult to explain things from the very very beginning.
 
  • Like
Likes Tam Le
Tam Le said:
I admit my ignorance
We're all ignorant, but on different subjects.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top