Electrostatic Force: -0.7nC Charge at Origin

AI Thread Summary
A -0.7nC charge is positioned at the origin, with a 1.9nC charge 3.9 m along the x-axis and a 0.8nC charge -1.7 m along the y-axis. The Coulomb constant is provided as 8.98755*10^9 Nm^2/C^2, and the goal is to calculate the electrostatic force on the charge at the origin in nN and determine the angle of this force relative to the positive x-direction. The user has calculated the forces along the y-axis and x-axis but is uncertain about the next steps. It is suggested to use vector addition to combine the forces, as they are perpendicular, making the calculation straightforward. The discussion emphasizes understanding vector components for accurate force addition.
peaceandlove
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A -0.7nC charge is located at the origin, while a 1.9nC charge is located 3.9 m away along the x-axis and a 0.8nC charge is located -1.7m away along the y-axis. The Coulomb constant is 8.98755*10^9 Nm^2/C^2. Find the magnitude of the electrostatic force on the charge at the origin. Answer in units of nN.
What is the angle between the electrostatic force on the charge at the origin and the positive x-direction? Answer in degrees as an angle between -180 and 180 measured from the positive x-axis, with counterclockwise positive. Answer in units of degrees.

Homework Equations


F=k(Q/r^2)


The Attempt at a Solution


I used the equation F=k(Q/r^2) to find the force of the charge between the origin and each of the charges. For the force along the y-axis, I got 2.960604706e-9 and -3.064984998 along the x-axis. However, I'm not sure where to go from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi peaceandlove! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
peaceandlove said:
I used the equation F=k(Q/r^2) to find the force of the charge between the origin and each of the charges. For the force along the y-axis, I got 2.960604706e-9 and -3.064984998 along the x-axis. However, I'm not sure where to go from there.

You have two forces, so now all you have to do is add them.

Forces are vectors, so you use the vector law of addition …

in other words, you can add them by using a vector triangle, or you can just add the components (same result) …

since the two forces in this case are perpendicular, either method should be extremely easy. :wink:
 
What do you mean by add the component?
 
peaceandlove said:
What do you mean by add the component?

(just got up … :zzz:)

If F has components Fx and Fy, and G has components Gx and Gy, then vector addition means you add the components:

if H = F + G, then H has components Fx + Gx and Fy + Gy :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top