Electrostatic Force/Coulomb's Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattdsaun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatic Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a student's struggle with a physics problem involving Coulomb's Law, specifically calculating the electrostatic force. The student initially calculated the force as 1.63E-15 but received an incorrect result. Responses suggested three possibilities for the error: a mistake in the online answer checker, incorrect value entry, or an error in the problem setup. Ultimately, it was determined that the student had miscalculated by using the wrong numerical values. The student acknowledged the mistake and expressed gratitude for the assistance received.
mattdsaun
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1zmgz6x.png


Homework Equations



F=qE

The Attempt at a Solution



So in solving the problem, parts a) and b) were rather easy, and I believed part c) would be easy as well. I assumed:

F=10156*(1.6E-19) which came out to 1.63E-15, but that was apparently incorrect and I'm not sure what else to try. Any help is really appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mattdsaun said:

Homework Statement



1zmgz6x.png


Homework Equations



F=qE

The Attempt at a Solution



So in solving the problem, parts a) and b) were rather easy, and I believed part c) would be easy as well. I assumed:

F=10156*(1.6E-19) which came out to 1.63E-15, but that was apparently incorrect and I'm not sure what else to try. Any help is really appreciated.

Welcome to PhysicsForums!


You are doing it correctly. So there are three possibilities:

i) there is a mistake in the online answer checker,

ii) you just punched in the wrong values by mistake when you did your multiplication (easy to check!)

iii) or there is a mistake in the online answer checker for part A and the E field there is actually incorrect.


It seems to me that the most likely is i).
 
nrqed said:
Welcome to PhysicsForums!


You are doing it correctly. So there are three possibilities:

i) there is a mistake in the online answer checker,

ii) you just punched in the wrong values by mistake when you did your multiplication (easy to check!)

iii) or there is a mistake in the online answer checker for part A and the E field there is actually incorrect.


It seems to me that the most likely is i).

Thanks for the reply. I wasn't aware that the problem had limited attempts and since posting this I have run out of attempts unfortunately. I have emailed my professor to ask him what was wrong with it and hopefully it'll get fixed. Thanks for the quick response!
 
10156 is not the same as the 10516 I saw in post 1. So the most likely is ii. Easy to check that 1.6*1.05 is not 1.63 but 1.68 indeed.

Pity about the score, but perhaps you have learned something much more valuable...
 
BvU said:
10156 is not the same as the 10516 I saw in post 1. So the most likely is ii. Easy to check that 1.6*1.05 is not 1.63 but 1.68 indeed.

Pity about the score, but perhaps you have learned something much more valuable...

Honestly did not even notice that, thanks for the help. That's what it was.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top