Electrostatic force in a medium of non uniform permittivity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electrostatic force between two point charges, +4 μC and -10 μC, separated by a dielectric slab with a dielectric constant of 9. The electric field is affected by the non-uniform permittivity of the medium, as half of the space is free air and the other half is the dielectric. The user attempts to find the effective permittivity and calculates it as ε_eff = 0.9, leading to a force calculation of 40N, which they believe is incorrect. They seek clarification on the correct method to determine the force and mention the answer options provided, which are 9N, 11N, 5N, and 12N. The discussion highlights the complexities of working with dielectric materials in electrostatics.
PhysicoRaj
Gold Member
Messages
538
Reaction score
49

Homework Statement


Two point charges, +4 μC and -10 μC are placed 10 cm apart in air. A dielectric slab of large area and thickness 5 cm is placed between the charges. Find the force of attraction between the charges, if the dielectric has a dielectric constant of 9.

Homework Equations


F=\frac{1}{4πε}\frac{q_1q_2}{r^2}

ε=ε_0{ε_r}

The Attempt at a Solution


The electric field exists in a region of non uniform permittivity. Half of the region is free space while the other half is εr=9. Now should I consider the effective permittivity of the space b/n the charges? Or should I calculate the electric fields in the two different media or something like that?
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I was searching for an equation for effective permittivity and I got it as
ε_{eff}=\frac{ε_r}{1+ε_r\frac{L}{L_{ε_r}}}
Plugging in 9 for ε_r, 5cm each for L and L_{ε_r}, I get ε_{eff}=0.9
Now
\frac{1}{4πε}=\frac{9\times10^9}{ε_{eff}}=10^{10}

So F=\frac{10^{10}\times40\times10^{-12}}{(0.1)^2}
F=40N and its wrong
 
Last edited:
Anybody please?
 
What is the correct answer as per answer key ?
 
Ok, I have to search it, its been a long time. Wait..
 
They have not given the answer.. there are 4 options: 9N, 11N, 5N, 12N.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top