Electrostatic Force on b: Positive & Negative?

Air
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
1. All variables and given/known data:

Diagram-1.jpg

a = c = 1 \times 10^{-19} C
b = 2 \times 10^{-19} C
Distance between a&b = b&c = 0.1m (b at origin, a at (0, 0.1) and c at (0, -0.1))


2. Homework Equations :

F = k\frac{|q_1||q_2|}{r^2}


3. The problem that I'm having:

Am I correct to think that the electrostatic force on b from other charges is at a minimum because the Force will be positive and negative (due to the nature of r (\pm 0.1)) cancelling each other out? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Air said:
1. All variables and given/known data:

Diagram-1.jpg

a = c = 1 \times 10^{-19} C
b = 2 \times 10^{-19} C
Distance between a&b = b&c = 0.1m (b at origin, a at (0, 0.1) and c at (0, -0.1))


2. Homework Equations :

F = k\frac{|q_1||q_2|}{r^2}


3. The problem that I'm having:

Am I correct to think that the electrostatic force on b from other charges is at a minimum because the Force will be positive and negative (due to the nature of r (\pm 0.1)) cancelling each other out? :confused:

Yes, the force on b due to a is "pointing down", and the force on b due to c is "pointing up", and the magnitudes of those forces are equal (from your equation). And so the vector sum of all the forces on b is zero in the situation shown.
 
olgranpappy said:
Yes, the force on b due to a is "pointing down", and the force on b due to c is "pointing up", and the magnitudes of those forces are equal (from your equation). And so the vector sum of all the forces on b is zero in the situation shown.

I just realized that the radius will be squared hence the negative will also produce a positive force. How does it equal zero then (Surely, it will just equal 2F)? Am I to use another formula or is the electrostatic formula correct to use?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top