Electrostatic Forces on Charges at Different Locations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pietjuh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electrostatic forces on a charge -Q located at the origin due to two other charges. In the first scenario, the forces from charges located at (a,0,0) and (0,a,0) combine to yield a total force of Q^2/(4πε0a^2)(x+y). In the second scenario, a charge of 2Q at (a,a,0) results in a force of Q^2/(4πε0a^2√2)(x+y) due to the increased distance of √2a from the origin. The calculations confirm that the total force in the second scenario is larger, illustrating the inverse relationship between force and distance in electrostatics. Overall, the calculations presented are deemed correct and demonstrate key principles of electrostatic interactions.
Pietjuh
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
I've got the following problem:
1) We've got a charge -Q at location at the origin and two charges of the same magnitude but opposite sign at (a,0,0) and (0,a,0). Determine the total force on the charge at the origin.

2) We've got the same charge -Q at the origin but now a charge of 2Q at (a,a,0). Again, determine the force on the charge at the origin.
Then compare your answer to the previous question

The first thing I did was to calculate the separate forces and then add them together.

\vec{F}_1 = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{Q^2}{a^2} \hat{x}
\vec{F}_2 = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{Q^2}{a^2} \hat{y}

So the total force is given by
\vec{F} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{Q^2}{a^2} (\hat{x}+\hat{y})

Now for the second question the distance between the two charges is given by \sqrt{a^2+a^2}, so the force is given by
\vec{F} = \frac{2Q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{a\hat{x} + a\hat{y}}{(a^2+a^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}} = \frac{2Q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{a\hat{x} + a\hat{y}}{2\sqrt{2}a^3} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q^2}{a^2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\hat{x} + \hat{y})

Now I would like to ask you if these calculations are really correct? :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pietjuh said:
So the total force is given by
\vec{F} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{Q^2}{a^2} (\hat{x}+\hat{y})
Perfectly correct. You may want to write your answer as a magnitude times a unit vector:
\vec{F} = \sqrt{2} \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{Q^2}{a^2} [\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\hat{x}+\hat{y})]

Now for the second question the distance between the two charges is given by \sqrt{a^2+a^2}, so the force is given by
\vec{F} = \frac{2Q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{a\hat{x} + a\hat{y}}{(a^2+a^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}} = \frac{2Q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{a\hat{x} + a\hat{y}}{2\sqrt{2}a^3} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q^2}{a^2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\hat{x} + \hat{y})
Again, perfectly correct.
 


Yes, your calculations are correct! In the first scenario, the charges at (a,0,0) and (0,a,0) are both a distance of a away from the charge at the origin, resulting in a force of Q^2/(4πε0a^2) along the x and y directions. Adding these forces together gives a total force of Q^2/(4πε0a^2)(x+y).

In the second scenario, the charge at (a,a,0) is a distance of √(a^2+a^2) = √2a away from the charge at the origin, resulting in a force of 2Q^2/(4πε0(√2a)^2) = Q^2/(4πε0a^2√2) along the x and y directions. Adding these forces together gives a total force of Q^2/(4πε0a^2√2)(x+y).

Comparing the two scenarios, we can see that the total force in the second scenario is larger due to the closer distance between the charges. This shows that the force between two charges is inversely proportional to the distance between them.

Great job on your calculations! Keep up the good work!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top