Electrostatic polarization and paper bits attraction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on electrostatic polarization and the interaction between a positively charged glass rod and neutral paper bits. When the rod is brought close to the paper, the paper becomes polarized, with induced negative charges facing the rod, resulting in Coulomb's attraction. Upon contact, the charged rod may transfer electrons to the paper, but the paper remains polarized rather than ionized, allowing continued attraction. The key takeaway is that the electrostatic forces at play depend on the materials' properties, specifically their insulating nature, which prevents complete charge transfer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and Coulomb's law
  • Knowledge of material properties, specifically insulators
  • Familiarity with concepts of polarization and charge transfer
  • Basic principles of electron transfer and electronegativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electrostatic polarization in insulators
  • Explore Coulomb's law and its applications in electrostatic interactions
  • Investigate the effects of different materials on charge transfer and electronegativity
  • Learn about grounding and its role in charge neutrality
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining electrostatics, and anyone interested in the principles of charge interaction and material properties.

fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
Hello,
I have been reflecting over this for the past few days. We can charge two insulators by rubbing them against each other. The two materials end up having an equal amount of opposite charge. For example, a glass rod rubbed with silk will become positively charged and the silk negatively charged.

Small bits of paper can be attracted and moved around when the positively charged glass rod is brought close (without touching) to the paper bits. The neutral paper bits gets polarized (separation between the centers of positive and negative charged) and Coulomb's attraction take place: the induced negative charge on the paper bit faces the positively charged rod. But we can also touch the paper bits with the rod and the bits will stick to the rod. Wouldn't the positive charge on the rod neutralize the negative induced charge on the paper bit leaving the paper bit with a positive charge? If that was true, the paper bit would immediately get repelled by the positive charged rod. But that does not happen. Why? Is it because, both materials are insulators and even when the rod touches the neutral paper the positive charge on the rod will remain on the rod and the induced negative charge on the paper bit will remain on the paper?

However, that seems to go against the fact that simple contact between two insulator can allow charge to transfer between them (rubbing simply increases the amount of contact). So the positively charged rod should neutralize the negative induced charge on the paper bit...

Thanks,
Fog37
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
Physics news on Phys.org
fog37 said:
Hello,
I have been reflecting over this for the past few days. We can charge two insulators by rubbing them against each other. The two materials end up having an equal amount of opposite charge. For example, a glass rod rubbed with silk will become positively charged and the silk negatively charged.

Small bits of paper can be attracted and moved around when the positively charged glass rod is brought close (without touching) to the paper bits. The neutral paper bits gets polarized (separation between the centers of positive and negative charged) and Coulomb's attraction take place: the induced negative charge on the paper bit faces the positively charged rod. But we can also touch the paper bits with the rod and the bits will stick to the rod. Wouldn't the positive charge on the rod neutralize the negative induced charge on the paper bit leaving the paper bit with a positive charge? If that was true, the paper bit would immediately get repelled by the positive charged rod. But that does not happen. Why? Is it because, both materials are insulators and even when the rod touches the neutral paper the positive charge on the rod will remain on the rod and the induced negative charge on the paper bit will remain on the paper?

However, that seems to go against the fact that simple contact between two insulator can allow charge to transfer between them (rubbing simply increases the amount of contact). So the positively charged rod should neutralize the negative induced charge on the paper bit...

Thanks,
Fog37

Hello.

I'm trying to do my best to explain your question. I can be wrong:)
By rubbing a glass rob with a silk, some electrons in the rob transfer to the silk due to different electronegativities of both materials, I guess. As a result, the rod becomes positively charge as it has a lack of electrons in its volume.

Now, you get your charged rod closer to the paper (not touched yet). Then the electrostatic field from the rod makes the paper polarized, but the paper itself is not in a deficit of electrons; it is just polarized, not ionized. In this case, you can move the paper by moving the rod due to the electrostatic force between them. When the rod touches the paper, electrons in the paper may or may not transfers to the rod. But in either case, one of them, the rod and paper, is neutral and polarized and the other is ionized. So there must be an electrostatic force between them and they're attracting one another, like an ionic bond, literally:).

I'm sure that they're pushing each other when they're touching and the paper is grounded as they can be neutralized simultaneously by receiving enough number of electrons from Earth (the Earth is a source of an infinite number of electrons).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K