Electrostatic Potential in a Box

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for the electrostatic potential V(x,y,z) in a grounded rectangular metal cavity with specific boundary conditions. The user correctly identifies six boundary conditions, including V(a, y, z)=V1 and V(x, b, z)=V2, while the other sides are grounded. The approach involves assuming a separable solution for V and applying the Laplace equation, leading to three ordinary differential equations (ODEs). The user expresses difficulty in selecting the appropriate constants for these ODEs, as the choice affects the form of the solution. It is suggested to separate the problem into two cases with one potential set to zero for easier handling of the boundary conditions.
azupol
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A box shaped rectangular metal cavity of sides a, b and c along the x, y and z axes,
respectively, has one corner at the origin. Of the six sides, all are grounded except the one
at x=a and the one at y=b which are held at potentials of V1 and V2 , respectively. Find the
potential V(x,y,z) everywhere inside the cavity.

There are 6 boundary conditions, I think I've got them all correct:
i.) V(a, y, z)=V1
ii.)V(x, b, z)=V2
iii.)V(x, y, c)=0
iv.)V(x ,y, 0)=0
v.)V(0, y, z)=0
vi.)V(x, 0, z)=0

Homework Equations


## \Delta V = 0 ##

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to approach this, we assume the potential can take the form V(x,y,z)= X(x)Y(y)Z(z), twice differentiate with respect to each spatial coordinate and plug it into the Laplace equation. From there we get three ODEs, which are each equal to a constant. This is where I get stuck. I know the choice of these constants, in particular their signs, is dependent on the boundary conditions. I'm stuck at this point, I don't know which sign to choose for each constant such that A+B+C=0, since the form of each separated solution will change based on these constants. Previous problems I've done involved one of the sides of the box going to infinity, so it was easy to choose constants to satisfy V->0 as a coordinate went to infinity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest you work by separating your inhomogeneous problem into two (one where V1=0 and one where V2=0).

The variable separation is mainly efficient for finding eigenfunctions of the Laplace operator with homogeneous boundary conditions. For each of the inhomogeneous problems after the separation, think about which dimensions you have homogeneous boundary conditions in - for these dimensions the possible separation constants will be given by the homogeneity. The possible values of the last constant will then be given by those of the other two. You then have to construct a series solution which you adjust to fit the boundary conditions in the last dimension.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top