Electrostatic potential on the surface of a conductor

rbnphlp
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At the surface of a conductor the potential is constant .. I can't get my head around this ..

Homework Equations


E=-grad V

The Attempt at a Solution



The only reason I can think about this is Electric field is perpendicular at the surface , hence no work is done when moving a point charge around the surface , hence potential is constant ..

But if V is constant , the surely E=-grad (V)-> E=0 , which is not the case since there are charges on the surface of the conductor, so surely must provide a E field normal to the surface ..

Thanks for any help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Noone ? Does no one understand what I am saying or does no one know the anwer?
 
Say the surface lies in the xy-plane, for example. You'd have V(x,y,0)=V0 so that ∂V/∂x=∂V/∂y=0, but that doesn't imply that ∂V/∂z=0.
 
vela said:
Say the surface lies in the xy-plane, for example. You'd have V(x,y,0)=V0 so that ∂V/∂x=∂V/∂y=0, but that doesn't imply that ∂V/∂z=0.

Cheers :D
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top