Electrostatic problem (point charges)

martinskibg
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/3e00ce8695.gif


Homework Equations



Electric field equation derived from Coloumb's Law (given on the screenshot above).

The Attempt at a Solution



Solution is given in the form of answer sheet:

http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/0d23171fd2.gif

My problem is - I can't understand how the result in point b) is derived. My best guess was deriving an equation for Ey and equate it to 0 (taking into account the new values for a, b and Q). From there a relation between b2 and b can be derived. But I really don't understand why the result is fourth root of 2. My guess was square rooth of 2? It's unclear to me but it seems that if Ey has to be negated, than Q2 has an opposite charge compared to the other ones? Where is this "point of origin"? I'm really confused :(.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
martinskibg said:
My best guess was deriving an equation for Ey and equate it to 0 (taking into account the new values for a, b and Q). From there a relation between b2 and b can be derived.

That seems like a good plan to me. Just remember, that at the origin x=y=0.

Also, you might want to double check the solution to part (a) that you posted, because I see two missing negative signs after just a quick glance at it, and there may be more errors.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top