Electrostatics and aluminium foil problem

AI Thread Summary
A metal rod rubbed with a cloth becomes neutral while the cloth gains a positive charge. Small pieces of paper and aluminum foil are attracted to charged rods, but paper sticks due to polarization, while aluminum does not. The key difference is that paper is an insulator and can remain neutral, allowing it to stick, whereas aluminum is a conductor that loses charge upon contact. When aluminum touches a charged rod, they both acquire the same charge and repel each other. Understanding these electrical properties clarifies the behavior of materials in electrostatic interactions.
yipkawa
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1' after a metal rod rubbing with a cloth, is the metal rod remains neutral in charge whereas the cloth will be positive charge?
2' a small pieces of paper and aluminium foil are attracted by charged metal rods when the rods are brought close to them. however, the former stick to the rod while the latter not. why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yipkawa said:
1' after a metal rod rubbing with a cloth, is the metal rod remains neutral in charge whereas the cloth will be positive charge?
2' a small pieces of paper and aluminium foil are attracted by charged metal rods when the rods are brought close to them. however, the former stick to the rod while the latter not. why?
What do you think happens in #1? How are a piece of paper and aluminum foil different in terms of their electrical properties?
 
OlderDan said:
What do you think happens in #1? How are a piece of paper and aluminum foil different in terms of their electrical properties?

is it one of them is conductor but the other one not?
 
yipkawa said:
is it one of them is conductor but the other one not?

That is the important difference between the paper and the aluminum. When the paper is attracted and sticking to a charged rod it is because of a slight realignment of the charges in the paper. This is called polarization. The paper usually remains neutral, so the attraction continues.

When a piece of aluminum touches a charged rod, charge is transferred from the rod to the aluminum. Both objects wind up with the same excess charge and so they repel one another.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top