Electrostatics: Equilibrium distance & Acceleration

  • Thread starter Gazaueli
  • Start date
  • #1
6
0

Homework Statement



As indicated in the diagram, consider a rail inclined at an angle θ relative to the horizontal axis. A sphere (A) with a charge +q is fixed at the bottom of the rail. A second sphere (B) with a charge +2q and a mass (m) is free to move along the rail. The sphere (C), initially neutral (Q=0) is fixed above the rail, at a distance (L) from the sphere (A).

1. Determine the equilibrium distance (d) between the spheres A and B.

2. What charge, Q, is needed on sphere C in order to move the sphere B upwards with an initial acceleration, a[itex]_{0}[/itex]

Homework Equations



Coulombs law: F=[itex]\frac{kq_{1}q_{2}}{r^{2}}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



1. It seems like the equilibrium distance would be halfway between spheres A & C, but I think I'm missing something. Because sphere B is mobile, do I need to take into account the force of gravity acting on the sphere?

2. I think that in order to make sphere B move upwards, one would have to place the same charge on C as A, i.e Q[itex]_{C}[/itex]=+q, but given that C is placed higher than A, perhaps this changes?

As mentioned in a previous thread, my knowledge of physics is very elementary. Before this class, I had never taken a physics course and the last math course I had was very basic. I need very clear, precise and elementary explications: i.e as you would give to a child, because this is honestly not my strong suit. I don't have a strong mathematical background either, so again, easy, clear explanations (when possible) are best. I apologize if the question is worded rather strangely; it was translated from my homework which is in French, so if something seems unclear, I will do my best to explain it.
 

Attachments

Answers and Replies

  • #2
33
3
1. Initially C is neutral (Q = 0) so in the first question you don't need to consider C. Generally when you want to determine the equillibrium distance you write down all the forces on the body you study and find the point that their sum is zero. Of course take care of the signs.

2. It is actually the same technique as the first only that you use newtons second law of motion. You write all forces and you proceed. Be careful of the signs!
 
  • #3
6
0
Thank you for responding LeonhardEu!

1. Initially C is neutral (Q = 0) so in the first question you don't need to consider C. Generally when you want to determine the equillibrium distance you write down all the forces on the body you study and find the point that their sum is zero. Of course take care of the signs.
Ok, so since C is initially neutral, I don't need to take it into account for the first problem? So according to that, I would find the [itex]\vec{F}[/itex][itex]_{elec}[/itex] of spheres A and B, ie I used Coulombs law? But after that, I'm not sure how I would find the point that their sum is zero. I wasn't given any real numbers, so I'm not sure how I would go about doing that.
 
  • #4
33
3
(I suppose from your post that when it says the equilibrium distance it refers to the position where B takes no force). You use coulomb's law to find the electric force from A to B. But on B acts gravity too. So you have the gravitational attraction too. The component of gravity on the vertical axis is equal and opponent to the reaction of the ground so it shouldn't concern you. The thing you need to find is:
(component of gravity parallel to the plane)-(electric force from A to B) = 0. This will give you an equation to solve for distance x. that is the distance from A to point of equilibrium. You don't need real numbers. Just solve it with variables.
As you are new in physics you should know about problem solving these steps:
*Make good figures of the problems
*For each body studied make different diagrams with the body and the forces which act upon it
*NEWTON'S LAWS will give you the solution for accelerations or equilibrium positions (second and first law respectively).
Try to solve it and if you need anything more i'm here
 

Related Threads on Electrostatics: Equilibrium distance & Acceleration

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
24K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
180
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
337
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top