Electrostatics - infinite plates

Gil-H
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider two infinite conducting plates of some thickness with charge 2q and -q.
The system is in equilibrium, which means there's no charged particles in motion.
Find the charge distribution on the surfaces of each plate.
(designated as q1 q2 q3 and q4)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


All I know about infinite plates is that the electric field is σ/2ε0.
But that doesn't seem to help me here
 

Attachments

  • 2.bmp
    2.bmp
    100.9 KB · Views: 534
Physics news on Phys.org
Gil-H said:
All I know about infinite plates is that the electric field is σ/2ε0.
But that doesn't seem to help me here
Use that to figure out the field between the plates.

Hint: What's the field within the conducting material? Apply Gauss's law.
 
Thanks. You gave something to think about.
But I'm not sure I follow completely.

Because the field inside each plate is zero,
I used gaussian surface which encloses q2 and q3,
and that leads me to that:
q2 + q3 = 0,
and together with:
q1 + q2 = 2q
q3 + q4 = -q
I have three equations.

I need to get one more. How?
 
How about using some gaussian surfaces that enclose only one of the charges at a time?
 
Now I got that!
Thank you very much!

By doing that I achieved that:
q1 + q2 + q3 = -q4
q2 + q3 + q4 = -q1

and with:
q1 + q2 = 2q
q3 + q4 = -q

I ended up with:
q1 = 0.5q
q2 = 1.5q
q3 = -1.5q
q4 = 0.5q

which is the correct answer! :-)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top