Elementary particle spin question

mcjosep
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Ok, when it comes to particle spin i know that all protons spin the same, all neutrons spin the same and so on. However i am confused as to whether or not these particles are actually spinning or if this is just a word that means something else like different colors of quarks even though they are not actually different colors.

If they are spinning what does a 1/2 spin mean in terms of velocity of spin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mcjosep said:
... whether or not these particles are actually spinning or if this is just a word that means something else like different colors of quarks ...

If they are spinning what does a 1/2 spin mean in terms of velocity of spin?
Spin in general has nothing to do with orbital angular momentum. An electron with spin does not spin, there is nothing moving around in circles.

=> there is no velocity attributed to spin.

Your comparison with color in QCD is a good approach. Color is just an SU(3) degree of freedom. Spin is an SU(2) tegree of freedom. This SU(2) comes from the symmetry group of spacetime which is SO(3,1) ~ SU(2)*SU(2). SO(3,1) is just the Lorentz symmetry. By coincidence in four dimensions it happens to be locally isomorphic to SU(2)*SU(2) and this SU(2) allows for integer and half integer representations.

So spin has something to do with spacetime, but there is nothing moving around in spacetime.
 
spin is a very funny thing. It BEHAVES like angular momentum: it can be converted into angular momentum! (that is, a spin-1 particle can decay into two spin-0 particles with 1 unit of orbital ("ordinary") angular momentum between them, thus conserving total angular momentum). It also couples to magnetic fields the way ordinary angular momentum does (a charged particle moving in a circle has a magnetic dipole moment; so does a quantum particle at "rest" but with spin!). So in all ways, spin is an "angular momentum"!

But it is not like anything classical - it's not that the particle is "spinning" - it just has this extra quantum-mechanical "sense of direction".

It takes some getting used to. It's nutz! :wink:
 
One of the reasons you cannot see it as something that is really spinning, is that elementary particles which are thought to be point like have spin. but since they don't have any spatial extension it is impossible for them to rotate in the classical sense.
 
and they are not pointlike in the classical sense, either ...
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top