Elongation Calculation for Non-Uniform Forces: Which Force Should Be Used?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate elongation in a rod subjected to two opposing forces, the correct approach is to use the force F, not 2F, as each side experiences the same force. If the forces are unequal, the rod will accelerate, complicating the calculation. The key is to consider equilibrium; at any cut through the material, the forces acting on each segment must balance to avoid acceleration. This means that the relevant force for elongation calculations is the force applied on one side, not the total of both forces. Understanding these principles clarifies the correct method for elongation calculations under non-uniform forces.
manjuvenamma
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
How to calculate the elongation when we know we all other parameters?

Two sides of a rod is pulled by two forces of F Newtons in opposite directions. What should we consider F or 2F in the equation? I used 2F and got wrong answer as per the book. But, if it is true, why should be use F only? If the forces are unequal which force should be use to calculate the elongation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if the forces are unequal the rod will accelerate.
 
You are right, I missed the point, it was my blind spot. Thanks so much for making me realize that. Should we use 2F or F to calculate the elongation?
 
Hi manjuvenamma,

We use F is there is a force F on both sides. And if it is being stretched there will have to be a force pulling on both sides.
 
In your head,, think of taking a cut through the material. At the cut, draw in the forces on each surface necessary for each of the two pieces to remain in equilibrium (no acceleration). The forces that you have drawn are the forces experienced by the material at the location of the cut. Are these forces F or 2F? Do these forces depend on the location of your cut?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top