EM Laplace Equation Homework: Solving for Potential in Gap

rabbit44
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I've attached the question as I don't know how to write equations on here without them looking awful.

Homework Equations


Laplace -> del^2 V=0

The Attempt at a Solution


I've done the first bit (expression for Q0).

For the next bit I tried to solve laplace's equation to find the potential in the gap. I called the general radius of a point u, as r is already taken. I was then going to use the boundary condition that
-dV/du (at u=a) = charge density/permittivity of free space

Which is from the boundary condition for perpendicular field components, and the field must be zero inside the solid sphere.

I took delta to be along the z-axis, so the problem has azimuthal symmetry and we can use the usual general solution of

V = sum[Pl(cost) (Al u^l + Bl u^-(l+1))]

Where t is theta.

Looking at the answer given for charge density, I thought this V would only include an l=0 and l=1 term. So I used them and then used the boundary conditions that

V=0 at u=r=b + delta*cost
V=V0 at u=a

However this did not give me the result.

Any help? Thanks
 

Attachments

  • EM problem.jpg
    EM problem.jpg
    50.3 KB · Views: 451
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try the method of images?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top