EM theory and therom dynamic books

AI Thread Summary
For EM theory, recommendations include "Electromagnetic Fields and Waves" by Lorrain and Corson, and "Fundamentals of Electromagnetic Phenomena" by the same authors. For thermodynamics, the book "Thermodynamics, Kinetic Theory, and Statistical Thermodynamics" by Francis W. Sears and Gerhard L. Salinger is suggested. A commonly recommended text for first-year undergraduates is "Fundamentals of Classical Thermodynamics" by Van Wylen and Sonntag. The discussion highlights the challenge of recalling specific book titles and authors, particularly for EM theory. Overall, participants share their experiences and suggest well-regarded textbooks for both subjects.
Gamma
Messages
355
Reaction score
11
Hello,

I need to purchase two books, for EM theory and Thermodynamics. I have briefly used couple of books years back and I can't seem to remember their titles or author. I slightly remember that the EM book was a blue color with a lots of information for first year - 4th year undergraduates majoring in physics.

As for the thermodynamics, the author is Sears .? or something.

Is anybody familier with these books. Please let me know. If you are not, then can you give me your opinion on what books are good.

Thanks a bunch,


Gamma.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fundamentals of Classical Thermodynamics by Van Wylen and Sonntag is the recomended book in my college for the first year undergrad.
 
I used a light blue book in EM about 30 years ago :biggrin:

Lorrain and Corson, Electromagnetic Fields and Waves

and the authors also have another book

Fundamentals of ELECTROMAGNETICS PHENOMENA, by Paul Lorrain, Dale R. Corson and François Lorrain. and a website - http://www.whfreeman.com/lorrain/

There is -
Francis W. Sears, Gerhard L. Salinger
Thermodynamics, Kinetic Theory, and Statistical Thermodynamics (3rd Edition) - https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/020106894X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Books by Francis W. Sears -
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/020106894X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Disclaimer: No endorsement expressed or implied. :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
siddharth said:
Fundamentals of Classical Thermodynamics by Van Wylen and Sonntag is the recomended book in my college for the first year undergrad.
I used that one about 30 years ago too. :biggrin:
 
30 years ago...You sure don't look like say 30+20=50. :wink:

That's the guy...Sears and Salinger for thermodynamics. I used this book for some time so I like to read the same one to refresh my memory.

About the EM,
I know.. I know there are many blue color books. Sure there were blue books 30 years ago too.

while I was lying down this afternoon my memory slightly came back. I think the author's name is some thing like Wengness??

Thanks.

Gamma.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top