EM wave generation using a single charge in a vaccum?

AI Thread Summary
Generating a propagating electromagnetic (EM) wave from a single oscillating charge in a vacuum is theoretically possible, as described by the Lienard-Wiechert potentials. Unlike a dipole antenna, which relies on opposite charges to create a detaching field, a single charge's oscillation primarily alters the direction of the electric field rather than creating a propagating wave. The discussion highlights the confusion between electrostatic fields and radiated fields, emphasizing that the latter results from the acceleration of charges. While the oscillating charge generates an electromagnetic wave, the nature of the field's propagation differs from that of a dipole. Understanding this distinction is crucial for interpreting the behavior of fields around oscillating charges.
DoobleD
Messages
259
Reaction score
20
I wonder if it is possible to generate a propagating EM wave by making a single charge oscillate in vacuum ?

In practice, when we create EM waves, we (always ?) have opposite charges oscillating, like with a dipole antenna :

67.jpg

felder_um_dipol-jpg.jpg


In the dipole antenna case, I can see how the fields detach from the antenna when opposite charge oscillate. But if we only have a single charge oscillating in vaccum, is it still possible for the fields to "detach" from the charge ?

23.jpg


When the single charge oscillates, I can picture in my head the E field progressively updating, like waves on ropes (the rope being the E field here). That sounds kind of like an EM wave. But it seems a totally different situation than with a dipole antenna. Here it doesn't seem like the field can "detach" from the charge. Also, I'm not sure the magnitude of the field really varies in space and time here, it seems more like only its direction changes.

I didn't try to calculate anything, not sure where to start for this question. So I'm just trying to picture things in my head, and I realized I don't know how to interpret the field around a single charge oscillating in vaccum. Is it a an wave, is it not really ?
 

Attachments

  • 67.jpg
    67.jpg
    13.4 KB · Views: 2,035
  • felder_um_dipol-jpg.jpg
    felder_um_dipol-jpg.jpg
    52.9 KB · Views: 1,179
  • 23.jpg
    23.jpg
    18.5 KB · Views: 850
Physics news on Phys.org
To my knowledge, this charge will generate an electromagnetic wave. The very definition of an electromagnet is a wave generated by a oscillating charge.

I think you are also confusing many terms. Your question seems very jumbled up and I am finding it difficult to interpret the question.
 
DoobleD said:
I wonder if it is possible to generate a propagating EM wave by making a single charge oscillate in vacuum ?
Certainly. This is described by the Lienard Wiechert potentials.
 
  • Like
Likes DoobleD
DoobleD said:
I wonder if it is possible to generate a propagating EM wave by making a single charge oscillate in vacuum ?
I think your dipole drawings (a) to (d) depict the electric field (electrostatic field) from the charges and not from the radiated field. The latter comes from the acceleration of charges in the conductors and is greatest near the centre. The electrostatic fields are just energy stores and do not propagate away as traveling waves as you depict.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for the answers. I'll have a look at Lienard Wiechert potentials.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top