EM Waves & Forces: Does a Particle Feel Force?

AI Thread Summary
A particle in the path of an electromagnetic (EM) wave can experience a force due to the electric and magnetic fields present in the wave. EM waves can indeed cause charged particles to move, as demonstrated by radio antennas where radio waves induce electron movement. When photons collide with particles, such as a silicon atom, they can impart momentum despite being massless, due to their energy and momentum properties. The discussion highlights that conservation of momentum allows for the transfer of force from photons to particles. Overall, the interaction between EM waves and charged particles is significant and complex.
VishalChauhan
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Would a particle kept in the path of an electromagnetic wave experience a force?
Both magnetic and electric field are present, so the equation of motion may be complex, but i have never seen my textbook refer to the the possibility of an em wave causing a charged particle to move.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EM waves cause particles to move all the time. That's how a radio antenna works - the radio wave causes the electrons in the antenna to move, which produces a current, which is detected by the radio receiver.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
So if a charged particle is kept in a ray of light, would it begin to accelerate?
 
I'm not sure what you mean by "kept in a ray of light", but yes, the EM field of light can accelerate charges.
 
Well of course a light wave can accelerate a charged particle, an EM wave has the M part in it, which would affect a charged particle.

What I've always wondered is, if you had, say, an atom of silicon floating in space and a stream of photons came flying at it, a few photons would hit the silicon atom. Would these collisions cause the silicon atom to move?

I know a photon is massless, so conservation of momentum says no, but it also has a lot of energy attached to it (doesn't it?) so from E=mc^2, shouldn't it be able to impart some force?
 
The photon has momentum even though it's massless. So there is no contradiction. Conservation of momentum does not say "no".:smile:

But I think you should start a new topic, as you bring a different question.
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...

Similar threads

Back
Top