EM waves in phase and E/B = c question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between electric field (E) and magnetic field (B) in electromagnetic waves, specifically addressing the equation Emax/Bmax = c and the phase alignment of E and B. It highlights that while both fields reach zero simultaneously, the ratio E/B remains valid at all points except where both fields vanish, as it is defined by their maximum amplitudes. The analogy of distributing candy among kids illustrates that the ratio remains consistent until the last piece is given away, emphasizing that the limit of E/B as E approaches zero still equals c. The conversation concludes that the indeterminate form 0/0 does not invalidate the relationship, as calculus principles confirm the limit holds true. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping electromagnetic wave behavior.
cosmogrl
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
My textbook (Serway and Jewett, Physics for Scientists and Engineers) says that Emax/Bmax = E/B = c. And that E and B are in phase. My question is, if they are in phase, they both reach zero at the same time. At that point, E/B = 0/0 and not c. I know I am missing something, but not sure what.

E = Emax cos (kx - wt) and B = Bmax cos (kx - wt), so if they are in phase, they both equal zero at the same time (when cos = 0) and max at the same time. My brain is having a hard time understanding what happens when they both equal zero, how does that tell me that E/B = c?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way to think of it is that ##E(x,t) = E_{max}\cos(kx-\omega t)##, ##B(x,t) = B_{max}\cos(kx-\omega t)## and that ##E_{max}=cB_{max}##. Clearly when ##E(x,t)## is zero, so is ##B(x,t)##. From the third equation you get ##E_{max}/B_{max} = c##. You can take the ratio ##E(x,t)/B(x,t)## and verify that it is equal to ##c## at all points and times except where and when the fields vanish.

On edit: Nothing happens when the fields vanish. Think of this, you have N kids in a room and N pieces of candy. You give out one piece of candy to one kid tell the kid to eat it and then leave the room. Repeat with another kid and so on. Through this process, the ratio of candy pieces to kids is always 1, all the way down to the last kid. What happens to the ratio after the last kid eats the last piece of candy and leaves the room?
 
Last edited:
Yes, that's a better way to think of the relationship between E and B, as E = cB. In the usual derivation which you can see at e.g.

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node48.html

it actually emerges as ##B_{max} = E_{max} / c##. (equation 457 on that page, with different notation for the amplitude of the wave)
 
kuruman said:
The way to think of it is that ##E(x,t) = E_{max}\cos(kx-\omega t)##, ##B(x,t) = B_{max}\cos(kx-\omega t)## and that ##E_{max}=cB_{max}##. Clearly when ##E(x,t)## is zero, so is ##B(x,t)##. From the third equation you get ##E_{max}/B_{max} = c##. You can take the ratio ##E(x,t)/B(x,t)## and verify that it is equal to ##c## at all points and times except where and when the fields vanish.

On edit: Nothing happens when the fields vanish. Think of this, you have N kids in a room and N pieces of candy. You give out one piece of candy to one kid tell the kid to eat it and then leave the room. Repeat with another kid and so on. Through this process, the ratio of candy pieces to kids is always 1, all the way down to the last kid. What happens to the ratio after the last kid eats the last piece of candy and leaves the room?
I like the candy/kid analogy, but is there a way to show mathematically how E/B = c even when E and B are zero? Or at that point, do we have to do the ratio of the amplitudes?
 
cosmogrl said:
At that point, E/B = 0/0 and not c.
Nah. That's not the way it works. 0/0 is indeterminate and not meaningful operation. The Limit of E/B as E approaches 0 is still c. That's the basic idea of Calculus.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top