Emergency Thermal Expansion question(Mech. Materials)

AI Thread Summary
A negative temperature change is possible, and when a bar is cooled from 100° to 70°, it contracts. If the bar is between two rigid supports, the reaction will be in tension to compensate for this contraction. The principle of superposition can be applied to analyze the effects of both thermal changes and any axial forces acting on the bar. By addressing thermal effects and axial loads separately and then combining the results, one can accurately determine the reactions at the supports. Detailed connection analysis requires additional information about how the bar is secured to the supports.
theman408
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
If the change in temperature is negative:

1st of all, is it possible? and second, if it's a bar between two rigid supports, does the reaction would have to be in tension instead of compression to compensate for the bars trying to contract due to temperature? Also what if it has an axial force as well?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Of course there can be a negative temperature change. The bar is 100°, and now it's 70, that's a -30° temperature change.

As for the bar, you can use the principle of superposition to not only think about the reactions, but the second load as well. First, consider the bar with only one support. As the bar cools down, it shrinks. Superposition says that in order to achieve the state that the bar is in, the second support must "stretch" the bar until it's at its original position.

This means that the bar will be in tension. As for the supports, typically we look at the beam alone, for detailed connection analysis, you would need more information about how the beam is actually connected.

As for the separate axial load, use the principle again. Find the solution for thermal effects alone; find the solution for the axial force alone. Add them.
 
I was able to solve the problem without using super position and doing them by sections. I assumed the reactions going against the wall instead of away and it worked out perfectly.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top