- #1
Galfer
- 2
- 0
Hi all!
I'm studying electrical generators, and while I was trying to come up to the expression of EMF induced in a conductor I got two different results following two different ways, and I can't find the error.
With sinusoidal B, with [tex]e=bvl[/tex] I get an RMS value [tex]E=2K_{f}f\phi[/tex], while with [tex]e=\frac{d\Lambda}{dt}[/tex] I get [tex]E=\pi K_{f}f\phi[/tex]
Following the calculations; can you please tell me where the error is?
Case 1:
p = polar pairs
r = radius
ƒ = frequency
Kf = form factor
[tex]\tau=\frac{\pi r}{p}[/tex]
[tex]v=2f\tau[/tex]
[tex]E=K_{f}B_{m}lv=K_{f}\frac{\phi}{\tau l}l2f \tau=2K_{f}f\phi[/tex]
Case 2:
[tex]e=\frac{d\Lambda}{dt}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{d\phi}{dt}[/tex]
[tex]E_{M}=\sqrt{2}E=\frac{1}{2}\phi_{M}\omega=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{2}K_{f}\phi2\pi f=\pi f\sqrt{2}K_{f}\phi[/tex]
[tex]E=\pi K_{f}f\phi[/tex]
I thought it could be a [tex]\frac{2}{\pi}[/tex] due to a mean value, but the flux is the same in both the expressions...
I'm studying electrical generators, and while I was trying to come up to the expression of EMF induced in a conductor I got two different results following two different ways, and I can't find the error.
With sinusoidal B, with [tex]e=bvl[/tex] I get an RMS value [tex]E=2K_{f}f\phi[/tex], while with [tex]e=\frac{d\Lambda}{dt}[/tex] I get [tex]E=\pi K_{f}f\phi[/tex]
Following the calculations; can you please tell me where the error is?
Case 1:
p = polar pairs
r = radius
ƒ = frequency
Kf = form factor
[tex]\tau=\frac{\pi r}{p}[/tex]
[tex]v=2f\tau[/tex]
[tex]E=K_{f}B_{m}lv=K_{f}\frac{\phi}{\tau l}l2f \tau=2K_{f}f\phi[/tex]
Case 2:
[tex]e=\frac{d\Lambda}{dt}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{d\phi}{dt}[/tex]
[tex]E_{M}=\sqrt{2}E=\frac{1}{2}\phi_{M}\omega=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{2}K_{f}\phi2\pi f=\pi f\sqrt{2}K_{f}\phi[/tex]
[tex]E=\pi K_{f}f\phi[/tex]
I thought it could be a [tex]\frac{2}{\pi}[/tex] due to a mean value, but the flux is the same in both the expressions...
Last edited: