Emission current from hot cathode in an X-ray sourse

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of X-ray intensity in relation to emission current from a hot cathode. It is noted that the intensity levels off at high emission currents, likely due to the limited number of electrons that can be emitted and the resulting "space charge effect" that creates a cloud of electrons around the filament. This phenomenon prevents further increases in X-ray production unless the anode voltage is raised to extract the electrons more efficiently. Additionally, the saturation intensity was measured without aluminum in the beam path, revealing that the count rate with the aluminum block is significantly lower. The conversation highlights the complexities of measuring X-ray intensity and the factors influencing it, particularly at high emission currents.
proudtobeaj
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Part of an experiment involved measuring the intensity of an X-ray beam through a piece of aluminium as a function of emission current of the X-ray source. I originally fitted a linear fit to my data (although it does start to level off at high emission currents). The marker however said that it was not a linear fit, and said it was heading towards "saturation", but I am not quite sure what he meant. The detector is definitely NOT at saturation as the measured intensities are well below the saturation level (measured earlier)

Why does the intensity of the beam level off at high emission currents? Is it because there can only be so many electrons "boiled off" from the cathode, so it can only produce so many X-rays in collisions with the target?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
proudtobeaj said:
Why does the intensity of the beam level off at high emission currents? Is it because there can only be so many electrons "boiled off" from the cathode, so it can only produce so many X-rays in collisions with the target?

Was the saturation intensity measured with the same aluminum block interposed? Could the intensity on the source side of the block be higher than on the detector side?
 
gneill said:
Was the saturation intensity measured with the same aluminum block interposed? Could the intensity on the source side of the block be higher than on the detector side?

The saturation intensity was measured with no aluminium in the path of the beam. the count rate (with the block in place) begins to level off at higher emission currents with only about half of the count rate of the beam whose path was unimpeded.
 
At some point as you heat the filament the electrons emitted from the filament begin to shield the filament with a cloud of electrons that have not been pulled out of the vicinity of the filament. Unless you increase the anode voltage and extract these electrons more quickly the flow will stop increasing. See "space charge effect"
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Back
Top