Emissivity as a function of wavelength

yellowputty
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello, I'm a little confused. I did an experiment today with a Leslie Cube. One of the faces was a black paint, and another a white paint. I know that white reflects well and has a low emissivity, at least in the visual wavelengths. In the Leslie's cube, was hot water, so I was measuring the Irradiance of thermal radiation. From the results I concluded that the white and black faces had similar emissivities (in fact the white face was slightly higher). I understand that emissivity depends on several factors, temperature, angle and also wavelength. How come in the infrared spectrum, both faces have similar emissivities? I have a feeling the answer lies in a blackbody diagram. Can someone point me in the right direction?

Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I just worked it out. Colour has nothing to do with a materials ability to absorb and hence emit thermal radiation. Colour is important in reflecting and absorbing wavelengths in the visible spectrum only. A white material will reflect all visible wavelengths, but a black surface would absorb all, and re-emit as thermal radiation.

I think oberlooked the way that visible light is then turned into thermal radiation. Thank you!
 
You may be correct. I thought of another problem. Maybe you are measuring reflected radiation that the cube reflects from external sources? How have you isolated this?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top