Empirical Formula of Sulfur & Oxygen Compound

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the empirical formula of a compound formed from sulfur and oxygen. A sample of sulfur weighing 1.28 g combines with 1.92 g of oxygen, leading to a total mass of 3.2 g for the compound. The calculations show that sulfur converts to 0.04 mol and oxygen to 0.24 mol, suggesting a formula of SO3. Participants clarify that in a compound, oxygen is not diatomic and should be considered as a single atom (O) rather than O2. The consensus is that the empirical formula is SO3, as SO6 is not a valid compound.
asadpasat
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
Please post this type of questions in HW section using the template.
A sample of sulfur having a mass of 1.28 g combines with oxygen to form a compound with a mass of 3.2g. What is the empirical formula.
So what i did is found the mass of oxygen which is 1.92g . Then converted the 1.28g S to 0.04 mol. Then converted the 1.92g O2 (as it says oxygen, or should it be just O?) to get 0.24mol O. I found online that the answer should be SO3, but I get SO6 because of Oxygen. Should I not assume it is diatomic, and just go with as just element?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
asadpasat said:
A sample of sulfur having a mass of 1.28 g combines with oxygen to form a compound with a mass of 3.2g. What is the empirical formula.
So what i did is found the mass of oxygen which is 1.92g . Then converted the 1.28g S to 0.04 mol. Then converted the 1.92g O2 (as it says oxygen, or should it be just O?) to get 0.24mol O. I found online that the answer should be SO3, but I get SO6 because of Oxygen. Should I not assume it is diatomic, and just go with as just element?
When the oxygen is combined with another element in a compound, it is no longer in diatomic form. Plus, there's no such compound as SO6, AFAIK, unless the valence of S is 12 instead of 2.
 
SteamKing said:
When the oxygen is combined with another element in a compound, it is no longer in diatomic form. Plus, there's no such compound as SO6, AFAIK, unless the valence of S is 12 instead of 2.
So when it says that oxygen is combining it should be just O, not O2. If i understood correctly.
 
Yes a single oxygen atom has combined with some other element(s).
It may or may not have originally been an atom which was existing previously as part of diatomic oxygen.
 

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Why Do Nebulae only have Hydrogen, Oxygen and Sulfur?
Replies
4
Views
1K
Chemistry How do we know ##BF_3## has Lewis structure but ##Al_2S_3## does not?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Calculate Temp Increase for Enthalpy of Sulfur Burning in Excess O2
Replies
1
Views
3K
Chemistry Find Empirical Formula of Unknown Substance
Replies
5
Views
2K
Chemistry Combustion Analysis- Empirical and molecular formula
Replies
8
Views
3K
What Is the Molecular Formula of an Unknown Compound from Combustion Data?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Chemistry What is the percentage of KClO3 in a mixture after removing oxygen?
Replies
12
Views
2K
Can the Mass of Oxygen in a Compound be Determined from Combustion Products?
Replies
9
Views
3K
Understanding Polyatomic Ion Charges and Number of Oxygen
Replies
2
Views
2K
How to find empirical formula from combustion equation
Replies
2
Views
9K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top